ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2025
Amlodipine-Based Therapy and Its Effect on Time in Target Range and Long-Term Blood Pressure Variability Across Age Groups in Chinese Patients With Primary Hypertension: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Asian expert consensus on high-quality hypertension management.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Systolic Blood Pressure Time in the Target Range and Blood Pressure Variability: The Effects of Amlodipine-Based Therapy.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
- Amlodipine-Based Therapy and Its Effect on Time in Target Range and Long-Term Blood Pressure Variability Across Age Groups in Chinese Patients With Primary Hypertension: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to compare systolic blood pressure (SBP) time in target range (TTR), long-term blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV), and BP control across age groups (18-45, 46-64, 65-79, ≥80 years) in patients with primary hypertension treated with amlodipine-based antihypertensive therapy for ≥12 months. Data were obtained from adult patients enrolled in the China Hypertension Center who received amlodipine-based antihypertensive therapy. Demographics, BP measurements, and laboratory results were recorded. Baseline characteristics, SBP TTR, long-term BPV, and BP control were compared among age groups. A total of 36 153 patients were included: 2681 in the 18-45 group, 14 300 in the 46-64 group, 15 595 in the 65-79 group, and 3577 in the ≥ 80 group. Younger and middle-aged patients demonstrated better indicator improvements. SBP TTR declined with age (82.52% ± 19.68%, 81.98% ± 20.69%, 79.10% ± 22.96%, and 78.33% ± 23.50%, respectively; p < 0.001). BP control also declined with age (84.04%, 83.20%, 80.44%, and 79.59%, respectively; p < 0.001). BPV increased with age, though not significantly (p = 0.051). During follow-up, SBP TTR and BP control improved, while BPV declined, with most changes reaching statistical significance. Across all age groups, SBP TTR remained above 78% throughout follow-up. Long-term continuous use of amlodipine is beneficial for achieving improved BP control, enhanced TTR, and reduced BPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.