Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40984034›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2025

Developing a Simple Non-Laboratory-Based Machine Learning Tool for Prediabetes Screening in a Target Population: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Tanja Fredensborg Holm, Thomas Kronborg, Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen, Stine Hangaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tanja Fredensborg HolmDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0007-1725-5922
Thomas KronborgDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2693-0527
Morten Hasselstrøm JensenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6649-8644
Stine HangaardDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0395-3563

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProgression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes (T2D) can be delayed with early detection and intervention. Current detection methods, relying on costly blood glucose tests, limit widespread screening. Machine learning models offer the potential for non-laboratory-based tools. However, existing prediabetes detection models lack validation in their intended target populations. Thus, this study aimed to develop and validate a non-laboratory-based machine learning tool for prediabetes detection in a specific target population.

methodsBased on 501 adults from a prediabetes screening project, a decision tree model was developed. Twelve potential non-laboratory-based features were extracted. The target variable was categorized into prediabetes (hemoglobin A1c [HbA

resultsOut of 501 participants, 88 were identified with prediabetes. The mean age and body mass index (BMI) were approximately 50 years and 27 in both the training and validation sets. Forward selection identified age and waist circumference as the most important features to include in the model. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) of 0.8297 and 0.7961 on the training and validation sets.

conclusionA machine learning screening tool using age and waist circumference was developed with promising results. Its simplicity, by only requiring two non-laboratory features, allows for easy implementation. However, to verify the model's generalizability and external validity, it needs to be evaluated using additional data.

Indexed as

decision supportmachine learningnon-laboratoryprediabetesscreening tooltype 2 diabetes prevention

Identifiers

PMID40984034
PMCPMC12460283

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.