Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40984083›Full record

ArticleMilitary medicine2025

A Framework for Advancing Burn Assessment With Artificial Intelligence.

Md Masudur Rahman, Mohamed E L Masry, Surya C Gnyawali, Yexiang Xue, Gayle Gordillo, Juan P Wachs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Current applications and prospects of artificial intelligence in burn diagnosis and treatment].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Md Masudur RahmanEdwardson School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.
Mohamed E L MasryMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine (MIRM), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, United States.
Surya C GnyawaliMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine (MIRM), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, United States.
Yexiang XueDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4533-0543
Gayle GordilloMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine (MIRM), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, United States.
Juan P WachsEdwardson School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.

Funding

FIrst REsponse BUrn Diagnostic System (FIRE-BUDS)R21LM013711 · NLM · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI GORDILLO, GAYLE M, XUE, YEXIANG · 2022 to 2023
$376k
NIH HHS 5R21LM013711-02NLM NIH HHS R21 LM013711Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs W81XWH-21-2-0030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBurn injuries are a significant challenge in clinical and military settings, requiring accurate and timely assessment to guide treatment. Traditional methods for determining burn depth, a key factor in severity, rely heavily on subjective evaluation, leading to variability and delays in decision-making. Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) offer solutions to improve diagnostic accuracy and standardization. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an AI model for burn depth assessment by comparing its outputs against a gold standard-focusing on image-based diagnosis of burn type and depth. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study analyzed 29 burn patients, under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol (IRB# 12,689) at the Eskenazi Burn Center, Indianapolis. Digital images of burns were collected and classified into 3 burn depth categories: first-degree, second-degree, and third-degree. The AI model was fine-tuned on 131 annotated digital images, augmented to 1,200 using techniques such as rotation, flipping, and brightness adjustment. Style transfer using a machine learning models (called GAN) was used to further enhance the dataset by simulating burn variations. Zero-shot (meaning no previous training) segmentation, employing pretrained foundation models, was used to localize burn regions without task-specific training.

resultsThe proposed AI prediction model achieved 79% accuracy in classifying 3 burn depth categories. Data augmentation improved performance, while segmentation demonstrated strong utility, particularly in identifying burn regions effectively in diverse scenarios. Style transfer augmented the dataset by simulating realistic burn appearances, further enhancing model robustness. Zero-shot segmentation, meaning it identified burn areas without any prior training on similar images, successfully localized burn regions, aligning with clinical expectations.

conclusionsThis study highlights the potential of AI in improving burn depth classification and segmentation. The results demonstrate that integrating AI-driven models into clinical care can enhance diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and scalability, offering transformative tools for clinical and military applications in burn care. These methods provide a foundation for automated and standardized burn assessment, improving outcomes across diverse settings.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBurnsAdultFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID40984083
PMCPMC12448692

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.