ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2025
Genetic Modification of Mesenchymal Stem Cell to Overexpress CXCR4 Enhances Treatment Efficacy for Brain Injury After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Recent trends in modified mesenchymal stromal cells: engineering approaches and international regulatory landscape.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Augmenter of Liver Regeneration-Modified Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Repairs Liver Damage by Regulating Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Pyroptosis in aAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Beyond immunomodulation: mechanisms and synergistic strategies of mesenchymal stem cells in promoting alveolar epithelial and endothelial repair in ARDS.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Advances in enhanced mesenchymal stem cell technologies: innovations and therapeutic applications.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Rearming mesenchymal stem cells with engineering strategies to combat cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Genetic Modification of Mesenchymal Stem Cell to Overexpress CXCR4 Enhances Treatment Efficacy for Brain Injury After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo investigate whether genetically modifying human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) to overexpress the CXCR4 receptor can enhance their therapeutic efficacy for treating brain injury following cardiac arrest (CA).
methodsMSC were engineered to overexpress CXCR4 (CXCR4-MSC) via lentiviral transduction. The migration capacity of these cells was tested using in vitro chemotaxis assays. In a rat model of CA/CPR, the homing ability of CXCR4-MSC to the brain was tracked in vivo, and their therapeutic effects on neuronal death and neurological recovery were assessed. The role of exosomes and their impact on key proteins (NLRP3, ASC, GSDMD) in the pyroptosis pathway was also investigated.
resultCXCR4 overexpression significantly enhanced the migration of MSC in vitro and their homing to injured brain tissue in vivo. Treatment with CXCR4-MSC markedly reduced neuronal death and improved neurological recovery in resuscitated rats. This was accompanied by decreased expression of NLRP3. Furthermore, exosomes derived from CXCR4-MSC were found to suppress pyroptosis-related proteins (NLRP3/ASC/GSDMD) in post-CPR neurons, an effect that was reversed upon exosome inhibition.
conclusionGenetic modification to overexpress CXCR4 enhances the therapeutic efficacy of MSC for CA-induced brain injury by promoting their migration to the brain via the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis. A key mechanism of this protection is exosome-mediated inhibition of neuronal pyroptosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.