Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40984725›Full record

ArticleJournal of extracellular vesicles2025

Sphingolipids in Extracellular Vesicles Released From the Skeletal Muscle Plasma Membrane Control Muscle Stem Cell Fate During Muscle Regeneration.

Rhyma Hakkar, Caroline E Brun, Pascal Leblanc, Emmanuelle Meugnier, Emmanuelle Berger-Danty, Olivier Blanc-Brude, Stefano Tacconi, Audrey Jalabert, Laura Reininger, Sandra Pesenti and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Rhyma HakkarLaboratory of Cardiology, Metabolism, Nutrition and Diabetes (CarMeN), UMR INSERM 1060-INRAE 1397, University of Lyon, Pierre Benite, France.
Caroline E BrunInstitut NeuroMyoGène, Laboratoire Physiopathologie et Génétique du Neurone et du Muscle, UMR INSERM 1315-CNRS 5261, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2824-5221
Pascal LeblancInstitut NeuroMyoGène, Laboratoire Physiopathologie et Génétique du Neurone et du Muscle, UMR INSERM 1315-CNRS 5261, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3214-5880
Emmanuelle MeugnierLaboratory of Cardiology, Metabolism, Nutrition and Diabetes (CarMeN), UMR INSERM 1060-INRAE 1397, University of Lyon, Pierre Benite, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2291-7691
Emmanuelle Berger-DantyLaboratoire Ecologie Microbienne, UMR CNRS 5557-INRAE 1418, VetAgroSup, Université of Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4388-3993
Olivier Blanc-BrudeUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM, UMR S970, PARCC, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4015-0615
Stefano TacconiLaboratory of Cardiology, Metabolism, Nutrition and Diabetes (CarMeN), UMR INSERM 1060-INRAE 1397, University of Lyon, Pierre Benite, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7424-1251
Audrey JalabertLaboratory of Cardiology, Metabolism, Nutrition and Diabetes (CarMeN), UMR INSERM 1060-INRAE 1397, University of Lyon, Pierre Benite, France.
Laura ReiningerUnité de recherche CEED DIATHEC UR 7294 Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Sandra PesentiLaboratory of Cardiology, Metabolism, Nutrition and Diabetes (CarMeN), UMR INSERM 1060-INRAE 1397, University of Lyon, Pierre Benite, France.
Catherine CalzadaLaboratory of Cardiology, Metabolism, Nutrition and Diabetes (CarMeN), UMR INSERM 1060-INRAE 1397, University of Lyon, Pierre Benite, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8858-6752
Vincent GacheInstitut NeuroMyoGène, Laboratoire Physiopathologie et Génétique du Neurone et du Muscle, UMR INSERM 1315-CNRS 5261, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2928-791X
Sanjay B VasanLaboratory of Cardiology, Metabolism, Nutrition and Diabetes (CarMeN), UMR INSERM 1060-INRAE 1397, University of Lyon, Pierre Benite, France.
Julien PichonOniris, INRAE, PAnTher, Nantes, France.
Thibaut LarcherOniris, INRAE, PAnTher, Nantes, France.
Elizabeth Errazuriz-CerdaCentre d'Imagerie Quantitative Lyon-Est (CIQLE), Faculté de médecine Lyon-Est, Université of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Christelle CassinCentre d'Imagerie Quantitative Lyon-Est (CIQLE), Faculté de médecine Lyon-Est, Université of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Bong Hwan SungDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8140-4685
Alissa WeaverDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4096-8636
Antonella BongiovanniInstitute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB) - National Research Council (CNR) of Italy, Palermo, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0307-4043
Karl RougerOniris, INRAE, PAnTher, Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3927-1735
Jean-Paul Pais de BarrosDiviomics Facility, US 58 BioSanD, University of Bourgogne, Dijon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5124-2283
Karim BouzakriUnité de recherche CEED DIATHEC UR 7294 Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0703-5105
Sophie RomeLaboratory of Cardiology, Metabolism, Nutrition and Diabetes (CarMeN), UMR INSERM 1060-INRAE 1397, University of Lyon, Pierre Benite, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3986-5936

Funding

Exosome secretion in breast cancer progressionR01CA206458 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PONIK, SUZANNE MARIE, WEAVER, ALISSA M · 2016 to 2025
$4.6M
Regulation of extracellular vesicle biogenesis through cell adhesionR01CA249424 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PUA, HEATHER H, WEAVER, ALISSA M · 2020 to 2025
$2.6M
Exosome Secretion in Tumor AggressivenessR50CA283661 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Bong Hwan Sung · 2024 to 2026
$603k
Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-20-CE18-0026Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-21-CE14-617 0081Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-22-CE14-0070NCI NIH HHS R01 CA206458NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249424NCI NIH HHS R50 CA283661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) represent a cytokine-independent pathway though which skeletal muscle (SkM) cells influence the fate of neighbouring cells, thereby regulating SkM metabolic homeostasis and regeneration. Although SkM-EVs are increasingly being explored as a therapeutic strategy to enhance muscle regeneration or to induce the myogenic differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), the mechanisms governing their release from muscle cells remain poorly described. Moreover, because muscle regeneration involves a tightly regulated inflammatory response it also important to determine how inflammation alters SkM-EV cargo and function in order to design more effective EV-based therapies. To address this knowledge gap, we isolated and characterized the large and small EVs (lEVs, sEVs) released from SkM cells under basal conditions and in response to TNF-α, a well-established inflammatory mediator elevated in both acute muscle injury and chronic inflammatory conditions such as type 2 diabetes. We then evaluated the regenerative roles of these EV subtypes in vivo using a mouse model of cardiotoxin-induced muscle injury, with a specific focus on their bioactive sphingolipid content. Using transmission, scanning or cryo-electron microscopy, lipidomic profiling and an adenoviral construct to express labelled CD63 in myotubes, we demonstrated that SkM cells release both sEVs and lEVs primarily from the plasma membrane. Notably, sEVs were generated from specialized membrane folds enriched in the EV markers ALIX (ALG-2 interacting protein X) and TSG101, as well as lipid raft-associated lipids. During regeneration, sEVs promoted M1 macrophage polarization and migration and muscle stem cell (MuSC) differentiation, thereby accelerating muscle repair. In contrast, lEVs inhibited and promoted MuSC proliferation and impaired the transition from the pro-inflammatory to the anti-inflammatory response, an essential step for promoting MuSC differentiation. Treatment of isolated muscle fibres with SkM-EVs revealed that the distinct effects of sEVs and lEVs on MuSC behaviour and macrophage phenotype could be largely explained by differences in their lipid composition, particularly the ratio of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) subspecies. However, TNF-α exposure altered these ratios in sEVs and impaired their regenerative functions on MuSC and their effect on macrophage migration and polarization. These results demonstrate for the first time the importance of the sphingolipid content of EVs released by skeletal muscle in their regenerative function within muscle tissue, largely explained by their role as carriers of different subspecies of sphingosine-1-phosphate. This suggests that modulating the sphingolipid composition of EVs could be a viable strategy to enhance the regenerative potential of muscle tissue in addition to therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Cell MembraneExtracellular VesiclesMuscle, SkeletalRegenerationSphingolipidsStem CellsAnimalsCell DifferentiationMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSphingolipidsextracellular vesicleslipidomicmuscle stem cellsregenerationskeletal musclesphingosine‐1‐phosphate

Identifiers

PMID40984725
PMCPMC12454923

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.