ArticleCureus2025
Barriers Affecting Diabetic Foot Care in Primary Healthcare Settings in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimDiabetes mellitus is a metabolic disease characterized by hyperglycemia, leading to long-term organ damage and complications like foot ulcers. Aggressive management of diabetic foot ulcers can prevent complications and lower extremity amputations. This study aimed to assess the barriers faced by physicians in managing diabetic feet in primary care settings.
methodsThis is a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in primary healthcare settings in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia, between 2024 and 2025, involving 220 participants through simple random sampling. The study used a structured, valid, pretested, and self-administered questionnaire to collect data. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) was used to analyze the data. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used, with a p≤0.05 considered statistically significant.
resultsThis study included 220 physicians (mean age: 32.14±6.05 years, 53.6% male), 130 (59.0%) had practiced for less than five years, 97 (44.1%) reported less than five continuing medical education (CME) hours related to diabetes, and 132 (60.0%) reported no special training in diabetes mellitus (DM). A majority of them, 160 (72.7%), rated their knowledge as average; 197 (89.5%) reported educating patients on preventive foot care, and 189 (85.9%) reported recommending therapeutic footwear. Only 102 (46.4%) probe for bone exposure in open diabetic foot (DF) infections, and 93 (42.3%) request serial radiographs. More than half identified a lack of continuing education and knowledge as the main barriers to the effective diagnosis and management of diabetic foot infections. Further barriers reported by participants were the absence of a vascular medicine specialty and a lack of diabetic foot management guidelines. Furthermore, 140 (63.6%) reported a lack of access to foot examination tools, and 152 (69.1%) reported insufficient time for comprehensive foot examinations.
conclusionThis study highlights significant gaps in knowledge, practice, and resources among healthcare professionals involved in diabetic foot management. The findings demonstrate the need for targeted interventions in Al-Ahsa to improve clinician competency, enhance resource availability, and address systemic challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.