Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40984979›Full record

ReviewBurns & trauma2025

Evolving functional hydrogel strategies for cartilage engineering: from fundamentals to functional regeneration.

Aikang Li, Jingtao Huang, Jiaqing Chen, Liangbin Wu, Hui Zeng, Zhenhan Deng, Peng Liu, Jianjing Lin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Burns & trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aikang LiDepartment of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lianhua Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518035, China.
Jingtao HuangDepartment of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lianhua Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518035, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4104-2402
Jiaqing ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Peking University, No. 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, China.
Liangbin WuDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lianhua Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518036, China.
Hui ZengDepartment of Orthopedics, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital (First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University), No. 3002 Sungang West Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518035, China.
Zhenhan DengDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Nanbaixiang Road, Ouhai District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0522-8269
Peng LiuNational & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Orthopaedic Biomaterials, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lianhua Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518035, China.
Jianjing LinDepartment of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lianhua Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518035, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1586-1415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Articular cartilage injury is a significant concern in osteoarthritis (OA), and while traditional pharmacological treatments and surgical interventions have provided some pain relief and promoted cartilage regeneration to a certain extent, long-term therapeutic outcomes remain suboptimal. The advancement of cartilage tissue engineering has introduced novel perspectives for cartilage regeneration. Hydrogel scaffolds, as crucial components in tissue functionality, have evolved from their initial role of physical coverage or single functionality to current combinations of diverse functionalities. This review thoroughly examines recent applications of functional hydrogels in cartilage regeneration. This article begins by discussing essential background information, including treatment strategies for cartilage defects and the fundamental characteristics of hydrogels. Next, within the framework of cartilage tissue engineering, we analyse five categories of functional hydrogels, emphasizing their distinctive physicochemical properties, drug delivery capabilities, and stimulus-responsive features for cartilage repair. The discussion extends to their mechanisms of action, classification, and limitations. Clinical products related to hydrogels in this field are also summarized. Finally, recommendations are offered to address current challenges and future directions in the development of functional hydrogels for cartilage regeneration.

Indexed as

Cartilage regenerationCartilage tissue engineeringFunctional hydrogelOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID40984979
PMCPMC12450350

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.