ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
Evaluation of machine learning models for personalized prediction of benefit from temporary mechanical circulatory support after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic value of machine learning for brain computed tomography as a predictor of neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Optimizing Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Candidate Selection in out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Machine-Learning Individualized Treatment Effect Approach Versus Rule-Based Criteria.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Predicting dynamic individual out-of-hospital cardiac arrest risks using explainable machine learning: a multicenter study in China.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The role of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains controversial. This study evaluates machine learning (ML) models for predicting mortality and neurological outcomes, highlighting their potential as a tool to guide early tMCS decision-making. Methods and results: This retrospective study analysed five years of data from 564 adult non-traumatic OHCA patients treated at Marburg University Hospital. Four ML models (ANN, SVM, RF, XGBoost) were trained to predict in-hospital mortality and neurological outcome based on demographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables. Feature selection and SHAP analysis were used to optimize performance and identify patients potentially benefiting from tMCS. Overall, 144 patients (31.2%) out of 461 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria received tMCS: 39 left-ventricular microaxial flow pump, 76 venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), and 29 biventricular support (ECMELLA). In 69 patients (14.9%) VA-ECMO implantation was performed as part of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The survival rate of the tMCS group was 34.7% (50/144) compared to 52.7% (167/317) in the non-tMCS group. The highest predictive power for survival probability (with/without tMCS) could be achieved by XGBoost and RF when applied to the non-tMCS group. Machine learning identified 2.5% of non-tMCS patients likely to survive if treated with tMCS. In 23 (RF model) and 31 (XGBoost model) patients, the probability of survival increased by at least 5% with tMCS compared to their predicted outcome without tMCS. RF slightly outperformed XGBoost [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.85 vs. AUC 0.82]. Conclusion: XGBoost and RF models accurately predict mortality and tMCS benefit in OHCA patients, supporting ML-based personalized therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.