ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
The prognostic value of cell-free DNA dynamics during chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinomas of the anus.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating Biomarkers in Localized Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Across Treatment Timepoints: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Review
- The prognostic value of cell-free DNA dynamics during chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinomas of the anus.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable biomarkers for assessing prognosis and monitoring response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are lacking in squamous cell carcinomas of the anus (SCCA). Liquid biopsies measuring cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by direct fluorescent assay (DFA) provide a simple, non-invasive approach. This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of cfDNA dynamics during CRT. Blood samples and clinical data were prospectively collected from SCCA patients undergoing CRT. Serum cfDNA levels (ng/μL) were quantified using DFA at baseline, mid-therapy, and end of treatment (EOT). Baseline levels were analyzed in relation to patient characteristics using Mann-Whitney U test and over time with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. In total, 126 patients were included, with cfDNA measurements at baseline (n = 126), mid-therapy (n = 103) and EOT (n = 108). Median cfDNA levels were 0.78 ng/μL 95% CI (0.72-0.85), 0.62 ng/μL 95% CI (0.56-0.72), and 0.66 ng/μL 95% CI (0.58-0.74), respectively. Baseline cfDNA levels were higher in patients with high-risk disease (T3-T4, N+ or M+) and performance status 1-2 (p < .05), but this did not appear to affect outcomes. cfDNA levels declined from baseline to mid-therapy and EOT (p < .001). A lower percentage decline was observed in non-responders (-9% 95% CI (-24; 33) and -37% 95% CI (-44; -29), p = .002) and treatment failures (-18% 95% CI (-36; 9) and -36% 95% CI (-44; -28), p = .02). Failure to eliminate below the baseline 75th percentile was associated with inferior disease-free survival (HR = 4.23 95% CI (1.50-11.93), p = .003). In conclusion, cfDNA quantification by DFA is feasible in SCCA. Low cfDNA elimination during CRT was associated with poorer outcomes, highlighting the clinical potential of cfDNA dynamics as a prognostic biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.