Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986129›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026

Climate conscious pharmacy practice: a qualitative interview study with pharmacists in the context of respiratory health care.

Rabia Cameron, Yasir Alhazmi, Philip Chi Lip Kwok, Bandana Saini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rabia Cameron *Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, A15, Science Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Yasir Alhazmi *Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, A15, Science Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Philip Chi Lip KwokSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, A15, Science Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Bandana SainiSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, A15, Science Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia. bandana.saini@sydney.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClimate change negatively impacts millions of people with respiratory conditions. On the other hand, respiratory health care negatively impacts climate change given that mainstay inhaler treatment poses its own environmental risk. Pharmacists are frequently involved in managing chronic respiratory conditions including counselling on inhaler use, thus they are well-positioned to reduce associated environmental impacts, however this role is unexplored.

aimThis study aimed to investigate Australian pharmacists' perceptions on the impact of climate change on respiratory health and the impact of respiratory health care provision or treatment use on the environment. We also aimed to explore pharmacists' views about their potential roles in promoting sustainable respiratory health care.

methodFollowing approval from an institutional ethics review committee, qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with consenting pharmacists who had at least one year of post-registration experience and were currently working in any clinical setting. The interviews explored pharmacists' general perspectives on climate change before delving specifically into respiratory health care. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and subjected to an inductive thematic analysis within a constructivist paradigm.

resultsThirty-two participants (72% female, 28% male) were interviewed. Three key themes were derived from the analysis: (1) environment considerations as an afterthought, (2) linking environment to respiratory care, and (3) working towards sustainable practice. Patient health was expressed as the main concern in clinical practice, with environmental considerations reported as lower priority. Most participants saw their role as being the management of patients 'respiratory symptom control'. Barriers to climate action described by participants included prescriber and patient acceptance of recommendations and concerns about counselling patients on switching to low carbon footprint inhalers being beyond their current scope of practice. Participants recommended multi-stakeholder collaboration and inclusion of this topic in pharmacy curricula as key factors to address to build sustainable respiratory health care provision.

conclusionPharmacists' main focus in respiratory health care provision is on clinical rather than environmental change issues. Many barriers such as concerns about patients' acceptance of sustainability related advice or counselling, and limited training on the topic were cited. Further research should explore best ways to address these issues, preferably in co-design practices with stakeholders.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClimate ChangePharmaceutical ServicesPharmacistsProfessional RoleAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchAsthmaChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseClimate changePharmacists

Identifiers

PMID40986129
PMCPMC12992453

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.