ArticleAdvances in therapy2025
The IMPACT Survey: The Economic Impact of Caring for an Individual with Osteogenesis Imperfecta.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe IMPACT Survey ("IMPACT") investigated the economic, clinical, and humanistic challenges of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) on affected individuals, caregivers, and the broader community. Prior publications detail the methodology, initial findings, healthcare expenditures, and quality of life (QoL) impact on adults with OI. Here, data is presented on the productivity and finances of caregivers and any predictors of impact. We hypothesise that caring for an individual with OI will impact the productivity and finances of caregivers.
methodsIMPACT, fielded July through September 2021 in eight languages, targeted adults and adolescents with OI, caregivers (with or without OI), and close relatives. Survey items covered demographics, socioeconomic factors, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, QoL, and health economics. We performed descriptive analyses of caregivers' productivity and finances and exploratory regression analyses to identify independent associations between care recipient and caregiver characteristics ("predictors"), and their economic impact on caregivers.
resultsOf 528 caregivers (without OI) with one care recipient, 64% were in paid employment. Of these, 50% reported missing workdays in the preceding 4 weeks (mean 1.9 days). Caregivers reported impacted finances, spending a mean total of €209 out of pocket (OOP) with the most spent on travel to medical appointments (mean €83) and medicine (mean €46) in the preceding 4 weeks. Caregiver spending varied across regions. Caregivers in the USA spent more in 4 weeks (mean €334) than caregivers in EU4 (France, Germany, Italy, and Spain) and UK (mean €163) or Nordic countries (mean €33). Predictors of productivity and OOP spending included caregiver age, sex and employment status, care recipient age, and various signs, symptoms, and events.
conclusionOur results suggest that caring for an individual with OI may impact caregivers' productivity and finances. The degree of impact may be predicted by caregiver and care recipient age, fracture frequency, and dental problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.