Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986300›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Neuromelanin-Sensitive MRI Contrast and Chronic Depression in Young Women.

Greg Perlman, Roman Kotov, Kenneth Wengler, Scott J Moeller, Guillermo Horga, Anissa Abi-Dargham, Daniel N Klein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Greg PerlmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Roman KotovDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Kenneth WenglerDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Scott J MoellerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Guillermo HorgaDivision of Translational Imaging, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York.
Anissa Abi-DarghamDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Daniel N KleinDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Whether chronic depression can be distinguished from nonchronic depression by mesolimbic dopamine hypofunction is a long-standing but untested hypothesis. Objective: To determine whether cumulative mesolimbic dopamine function, assessed with neuromelanin-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (NM-MRI) contrast, is associated with chronic depression in young women. Design, Setting, and Participants: In the Adolescent Development of Emotions and Personality Traits (ADEPT) prospective cohort study, depressive disorders in women were assessed by diagnostic interview at regular intervals from ages 14 to 22 years (between July 2, 2012, and March 5, 2021). The current analysis includes a subset of ADEPT participants (aged 20-24 years) who completed a cross-sectional NM-MRI imaging study conducted between June 15, 2019, and May 31, 2021. Data were analyzed from March 27, 2024, to June 30, 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: Course of depression was rated using semistructured interviews. The nonparametric permutation test (whole-mask voxelwise analysis) of NM-MRI contrast in 2060 voxels within the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area complex was used to test the association of cumulative mesolimbic dopamine function with chronic depression. Results: Of the 166 young women contacted for this study, 140 had no MRI contraindications and were eligible. A total of 118 women underwent imaging, and 13 were excluded for MRI artifacts. Therefore, 105 women (mean [SD] age, 21.6 [0.91] years) were included in this analysis. There were 9 women (8.6%) with chronic depression (mean [SD], 45.6 [21.7] months), 28 (26.7%) with nonchronic depression (mean [SD], 6.0 [5.4] months), and 68 (64.8%) with no lifetime history of depression. Women with chronic depression exhibited significantly lower bilateral midbrain NM-MRI contrast than both women with nonchronic depression (795 negative-sign suprathreshold voxels, corrected P = .005) and women with no lifetime history of depression (692 negative-sign suprathreshold voxels, corrected P = .01), who did not differ from each other. Furthermore, lower bilateral midbrain NM-MRI contrast findings were associated with lower trait extraversion, a personality trait that reflects blunted reward sensitivity and is implicated in chronic depression, acquired at time of MRI (1061 positive-sign suprathreshold voxels, corrected P = .002), as well as from an earlier assessment at age 14 years prior to the onset of depression (1054 positive-sign suprathreshold voxels, corrected P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of young women, chronic depression was associated with reduced NM-MRI contrast, consistent with cumulative mesolimbic dopamine hypofunction. NM-MRI contrast findings were normal in young women with nonchronic depression. These findings support the importance of distinguishing between chronic and nonchronic forms of illness in parsing the heterogeneity of depressive disorders, and they suggest that low dopamine may play a role in the etiopathophysiology of chronic depression.

Indexed as

DepressionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMelaninsAdolescentAdultChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansProspective StudiesYoung AdultMelaninsneuromelanin

Identifiers

PMID40986300
PMCPMC12457983

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.