ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2025
Machine learning approaches to racial/ethnic differences in social determinants of mild cognitive impairment and its progression to dementia in the All of Us Research Program.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study examines how social determinants of health (SDOH) influence mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and its progression to dementia across racial/ethnic groups, identifying disparities and key predictors using machine learning approaches.
methodsWe analyzed data from 83,180 participants aged 50+ in the All of Us Research Program (65,582 White, 6,207 Black, 4,170 Hispanic, 7,221 Other). The sample had mean ages ranging from 62.4 (Hispanic) to 68.1 (White) years, with significant gender disparities (70.9% Black females vs. 46.0% Other females). We developed machine learning classification models to predict MCI and its progression to dementia across the four racial/ethnic groups using 18 SDOH, along with key sociodemographic variables. We then applied SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify each factor's contribution and interpret its risk and protective effects on individual predictions.
resultsMCI prevalence was comparable across groups (7.5%-8.0%), but progression to dementia varied (9.4% Black vs. 11.4% Other). Perceived stress was the strongest predictor of MCI across all groups, with SHAP values of 15.1% (White), 13.5% (Black), 17.4% (Other), and 19.3% (Hispanic). Predictors of progression to dementia varied by groups: perceived stress (7.0%) for Whites, instrumental social support (14.2%) for Hispanics, daily spiritual experience (34.0%) for Blacks, and everyday discrimination (11.2%) for other groups. DISCUSSION: The findings underscore the need for group-specific interventions addressing stress mitigation for MCI prevention and culturally-tailored support systems to delay dementia progression. This machine learning approach reveals complex SDOH interactions that traditional methods might overlook, particularly for racial/ethnic underrepresented populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.