Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986403›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2025

Machine learning approaches to racial/ethnic differences in social determinants of mild cognitive impairment and its progression to dementia in the All of Us Research Program.

Qianyu Dong, Wenbo Wu, Yanping Jiang, Junyu Sui, Chenxin Tan, Xiang Qi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qianyu DongDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Santa Cruz, Baskin School of Engineering, Santa Cruz, California, United States.
Wenbo WuDepartments of Population Health and Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7642-9773
Yanping JiangDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0931-9507
Junyu SuiEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-9123-105X
Chenxin TanRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, New York, United States.
Xiang QiRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3958-8609

Funding

Rutgers-NYU Center for Asian Health Promotion and EquityP50MD017356 · NIMHD · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI WU, BEI · 2021 to 2025
$11.6M
Resource Center for Alzheimer's and Dementia Research in Asian and Pacific AmericansP30AG083257 · NIA · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI William Tzu-lung Hu, DENA J SCHULMAN-GREEN · 2023 to 2026
$3.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG083257NIH HHS P30AG083257NIH HHS P50MD017356NIMHD NIH HHS P50 MD017356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examines how social determinants of health (SDOH) influence mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and its progression to dementia across racial/ethnic groups, identifying disparities and key predictors using machine learning approaches.

methodsWe analyzed data from 83,180 participants aged 50+ in the All of Us Research Program (65,582 White, 6,207 Black, 4,170 Hispanic, 7,221 Other). The sample had mean ages ranging from 62.4 (Hispanic) to 68.1 (White) years, with significant gender disparities (70.9% Black females vs. 46.0% Other females). We developed machine learning classification models to predict MCI and its progression to dementia across the four racial/ethnic groups using 18 SDOH, along with key sociodemographic variables. We then applied SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify each factor's contribution and interpret its risk and protective effects on individual predictions.

resultsMCI prevalence was comparable across groups (7.5%-8.0%), but progression to dementia varied (9.4% Black vs. 11.4% Other). Perceived stress was the strongest predictor of MCI across all groups, with SHAP values of 15.1% (White), 13.5% (Black), 17.4% (Other), and 19.3% (Hispanic). Predictors of progression to dementia varied by groups: perceived stress (7.0%) for Whites, instrumental social support (14.2%) for Hispanics, daily spiritual experience (34.0%) for Blacks, and everyday discrimination (11.2%) for other groups. DISCUSSION: The findings underscore the need for group-specific interventions addressing stress mitigation for MCI prevention and culturally-tailored support systems to delay dementia progression. This machine learning approach reveals complex SDOH interactions that traditional methods might overlook, particularly for racial/ethnic underrepresented populations.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaMachine LearningSocial Determinants of HealthAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanDisease ProgressionEthnicityFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceUnited StatesAlzheimer’s diseaseArtificial IntelligenceCognitionHealth disparitiesHealthy aging

Identifiers

PMID40986403
PMCPMC12597675

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.