ArticlePloS one2025
How University students in Bangladesh engage with ChatGPT: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is Higher Academic Workload Associated with AI Dependency? Investigating the Roles of Academic Anxiety, Procrastination, and Satisfaction with AI.Psychology research and behavior management · 2026Article
- Correction: How University students in Bangladesh engage with ChatGPT: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined university students' perceptions and practices of using ChatGPT through a qualitative approach, employing semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 20 Khulna University students. Using thematic analysis, the research identified key themes, including both academic and non-academic motivations, with applications ranging from assignments and research to entertainment. Despite limitations such as false references and predetermined feedback, students found ChatGPT efficient and useful both inside and outside the classroom. However, concerns about academic integrity arose, as some students devised creative ways to bypass existing plagiarism detection systems. Ethical considerations emerged regarding responsible AI use, underscoring the need for clear guidelines and training to ensure proper referencing and the development of critical thinking skills. Future research should focus on continuous evaluation and the implementation of support services to encourage the responsible integration of ChatGPT in university settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.