ArticlePloS one2025
Flow cytometry protocol for cell death analysis in glioblastoma organoids: A technical note.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Core2Edge: a human glioblastoma organoid-brain slice model capturing infiltration and transcriptional heterogeneity from core to single-cell dispersion.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Organoids as next-generation models for investigating intracranial tumours.Molecular brain · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor organoid models have emerged as a promising tool in cancer research. By preserving intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity and structural integrity they provide a physiologically relevant platform for drug-response studies. However, valid methodological approaches for cell death analyses applying flow cytometry, particularly in complex, large organoids, are lacking. Using glioblastoma organoids (GBOs), we developed a flow cytometry protocol to quantify cell death as an important readout in cancer research. Human GBOs were generated out of tumor material from six patients. Temozolomide (TMZ) and lomustine (CCNU) were used as cytotoxic agents commonly employed in glioblastoma therapy. After treatment for 144 and 288 hours, single cell suspensions from densely-packed GBOs were generated through a combined approach of enzymatic and mechanical dissociation. Cells were permeabilized with Triton X and subsequently stained with propidium iodide (PI). PI staining labels fragmented nuclear DNA, yielding a hypodiploid sub-G1 peak in flow cytometry that markes cell death. After treatment for 288 hours with physiologically-relevant concentrations of TMZ and CCNU cell death rates reached up to 63% in our GBO model. Across three GBO populations, the impact of CCNU at the given concentration was more pronounced compared to that observed with TMZ and the cell death rates of treatment for 288 hours surpassed that of the 144-hour treatment. Both biological and technical replicates showed low variability. Hoechst 33258 staining on the same samples confirmed trends in cell death rates obtained from PI-based analysis. We further validated the treatment-induced effect using a plate-based lactate dehydrogenase release assay and measurements of GBO diameter. Our single-stain flow-cytometry protocol scales to large, dense organoids and provides a practical balance of performance, hands-on time, cost, specificity, and throughput. This protocol could support development and evaluation of subtype-specific therapeutic strategies in translational cancer research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.