Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40986554›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Flow cytometry protocol for cell death analysis in glioblastoma organoids: A technical note.

Anna-Laura Potthoff, Meng-Chun Hsieh, Ahmad Melhem, Susanna S Ng, Barbara E F Pregler, Annika Vieregge, Markus Raspe, Lea L Friker, Thomas Zeyen, Julian P Layer and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Anna-Laura PotthoffDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5710-6557
Meng-Chun HsiehDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Ahmad MelhemDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Susanna S NgInstitute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Barbara E F PreglerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Annika ViereggeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Markus RaspeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Lea L FrikerBrain Tumor Translational Research Group, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Thomas ZeyenBrain Tumor Translational Research Group, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Julian P LayerBrain Tumor Translational Research Group, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7692-7775
Andreas DolfFlow Cytometry Core Facility, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Marieta I TomaDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Andreas WahaInstitute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Torsten PietschInstitute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Mike-Andrew WesthoffDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Hartmut VatterDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Michael HölzelInstitute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Ulrich HerrlingerBrain Tumor Translational Research Group, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Matthias SchneiderDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor organoid models have emerged as a promising tool in cancer research. By preserving intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity and structural integrity they provide a physiologically relevant platform for drug-response studies. However, valid methodological approaches for cell death analyses applying flow cytometry, particularly in complex, large organoids, are lacking. Using glioblastoma organoids (GBOs), we developed a flow cytometry protocol to quantify cell death as an important readout in cancer research. Human GBOs were generated out of tumor material from six patients. Temozolomide (TMZ) and lomustine (CCNU) were used as cytotoxic agents commonly employed in glioblastoma therapy. After treatment for 144 and 288 hours, single cell suspensions from densely-packed GBOs were generated through a combined approach of enzymatic and mechanical dissociation. Cells were permeabilized with Triton X and subsequently stained with propidium iodide (PI). PI staining labels fragmented nuclear DNA, yielding a hypodiploid sub-G1 peak in flow cytometry that markes cell death. After treatment for 288 hours with physiologically-relevant concentrations of TMZ and CCNU cell death rates reached up to 63% in our GBO model. Across three GBO populations, the impact of CCNU at the given concentration was more pronounced compared to that observed with TMZ and the cell death rates of treatment for 288 hours surpassed that of the 144-hour treatment. Both biological and technical replicates showed low variability. Hoechst 33258 staining on the same samples confirmed trends in cell death rates obtained from PI-based analysis. We further validated the treatment-induced effect using a plate-based lactate dehydrogenase release assay and measurements of GBO diameter. Our single-stain flow-cytometry protocol scales to large, dense organoids and provides a practical balance of performance, hands-on time, cost, specificity, and throughput. This protocol could support development and evaluation of subtype-specific therapeutic strategies in translational cancer research.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsFlow CytometryGlioblastomaOrganoidsCell DeathDacarbazineHumansLomustineTemozolomideDacarbazineLomustineTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID40986554
PMCPMC12456761

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.