ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
When blooming, we recycle faster! Reciprocal intraspecific litter-mixing effects of floral and leaf litter decomposition.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When blooming, we recycle faster! Reciprocal intraspecific litter-mixing effects of floral and leaf litter decomposition.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The form and function of plant organs influence plant decomposition. Floral litter typically decomposes faster and is of higher quality than conspecific leaf litter. However, how intraspecific differences in litter quality between plant organs drive litter-mixing effects on decomposition remains unclear. We hypothesized that: (i) floral and leaf litter decompose faster when mixed than when decomposed alone, (ii) these synergistic effects are stronger for leaf litter decomposition, and (iii) litter-mixing effects are mediated by multivariate litter trait complementarity. To test these hypotheses, we conducted a common garden field experiment using floral and leaf litter from 28 tropical woody species. As predicted, synergistic effects were common and mutual for both litter types, with stronger effects observed in leaf litter decomposition. Different functional traits predicted litter-mixing effects for each litter type, supporting the hypothesis of multivariate trait complementarity. Autochthonous traits (inherent to the litter itself) accounted for two-thirds of the variation in litter-mixing effects for both litter types, while allochthonous traits (from associated litter) explained one-third of the variation. These findings highlight that functional differences between plant organs influence litter-mixing effects on decomposition. This advances our understanding of the litter diversity-decomposition relationship and its implications for nutrient cycling and plant-soil feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.