Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40987788›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Exploring the role of preprocessing combinations in hyperspectral imaging for deep learning colorectal cancer detection.

Mariia Tkachenko, Benjamin Huber, Serhii Hamotskyi, Boris Jansen-Winkeln, Ines Gockel, Thomas Neumuth, Hannes Köhler, Marianne Maktabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mariia TkachenkoCenter for scalable data analytics and artificial intelligence (ScaDS.AI) Dresden/Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. mariia.tkachenko@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Benjamin HuberAnhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, 06366, Germany.
Serhii HamotskyiAnhalt University of Applied Sciences, Köthen, 06366, Germany.
Boris Jansen-WinkelnDepartment of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Ines GockelDepartment of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Thomas NeumuthInnovation Center Computer-Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Hannes KöhlerInnovation Center Computer-Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Marianne MaktabiInnovation Center Computer-Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares various preprocessing techniques for hyperspectral deep learning-based cancer diagnostics. The study considers different spectrum scaling and noise reduction options across spatial and spectral axes of hyperspectral datacubes, as well varying levels of blood and light reflections removal. We also examine how the size of the patches extracted from the hyperspectral data affects the models' performance. We additionally explore various strategies to mitigate our dataset's imbalance (where cancerous tissues are underrepresented). Our results indicate that. Scaling: Standardization significantly improves both sensitivity and specificity compared to Normalization. Larger input patch sizes enhance performance by capturing more spatial context. Noise reduction unexpectedly degrades performance. Blood filtering is more effective than filtering reflected light pixels, although neither approach produces significant results. By carefully maintaining consistent testing conditions, we ensure a fair comparison across preprocessing methods and reproducibility. Our findings highlight the necessity of careful preprocessing selection to maximize deep learning performance in medical imaging applications.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDeep LearningHyperspectral ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumansReproducibility of ResultsCancer classificationColorectal cancerConvolutional networksHyperspectral imagingMachine learningPreprocessing

Identifiers

PMID40987788
PMCPMC12457627

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.