ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Initiation and Completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Total Versus Partial Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of Total Pancreatectomy Versus Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Surgical Management of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPartial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is standard treatment for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the pancreatic head. Total pancreatectomy (TP) has historically been reserved for extensive tumors or salvage procedures due to concerns about morbidity and quality of life (QoL). However, recent evidence shows comparable perioperative outcomes and QoL between TP and PD. The authors hypothesized that avoiding postoperative pancreatic fistula TP would achieve AC initiation and completion rates similar to those for PD, even in more complex patients.
methodsThis study retrospectively analysed all patients who underwent TP or PD for PDAC at the authors' center between 2014 and 2021. Rates, timing, and completion of AC were compared. The decision for TP versus PD was based on patient and intraoperative factors at the discretion of the surgeon.
resultsOf 263 included patients, 74 underwent TP and 189 underwent PD. Total pancreatectomy was performed mainly for repetitive positive resection margins or splenic vessel involvement (59 %). The TP patients had more comorbidities (liver disease, 16.2 % vs 5.8 % p = 0.013; diabetes, 40.5 % vs 24.9 % p = 0.016), longer surgeries (7.2 vs 6 h; p = 0.001), more vascular reconstructions (77 % vs 50.8 %; p = 0.001), and greater blood loss (1200 vs 600 ml; p = 0.001). Despite these factors, morbidity and mortality were comparable. The two groups did not differ in rates of AC initiation (66 % vs 76 %; p = 0.156), completion (69.4 % vs 74.1 %; p = 0.578), and timing (median, 7 weeks in both groups; p = 0.533).
conclusionDespite higher surgical complexity, AC initiation and completion rates after TP were comparable with those after PD. With modern diabetes management, TP represents a valid surgical option for selected high-risk patients without compromising oncologic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.