ArticleStatistics in medicine2025
Designing Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials With a Baseline Measurement of the Outcome.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The design of embedded pragmatic clinical trials: methodological developments and statistical lessons learned from the first cycle of the NIA IMPACT collaboratory.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRTs) are a type of uni-directional crossover designs and are increasingly common in prevention and implementation research. Although sample size formulas have been developed to support the planning of SW-CRTs, almost no prior methods incorporated the baseline measurement of the outcome-a common feature in many randomized trials and, increasingly, in cross-sectional SW-CRTs. In this article, we systematically investigate the possibility of addressing a baseline outcome measurement in designing cross-sectional SW-CRTs. We provide three linear mixed modeling approaches to adjust for the baseline outcome and derive the corresponding variance formula of the treatment effect estimator under each. The derived formulas reveal the efficiency implications of including a baseline outcome measurement, and provide a natural vehicle for the efficiency comparisons across adjustment approaches to generate practical recommendations. We validate the power and sample size methods under each baseline adjustment approach using simulations and provide an illustrative sample size calculation with a baseline outcome using the context of a real SW-CRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.