Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40988307›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Designing Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials With a Baseline Measurement of the Outcome.

Kendra Davis-Plourde, Keith Goldfeld, Heather Allore, Monica Taljaard, Fan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kendra Davis-PlourdeDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Keith GoldfeldDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Heather AlloreDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Monica TaljaardClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Fan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

Training Core (I)U54AG063546 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI JOSEPH E. GAUGLER · 2019 to 2026
$125.9M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS U54 AG063546NIA NIH HHS U54AG063546Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute ME-2020C3-21072Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute ME-2022C2-27676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRTs) are a type of uni-directional crossover designs and are increasingly common in prevention and implementation research. Although sample size formulas have been developed to support the planning of SW-CRTs, almost no prior methods incorporated the baseline measurement of the outcome-a common feature in many randomized trials and, increasingly, in cross-sectional SW-CRTs. In this article, we systematically investigate the possibility of addressing a baseline outcome measurement in designing cross-sectional SW-CRTs. We provide three linear mixed modeling approaches to adjust for the baseline outcome and derive the corresponding variance formula of the treatment effect estimator under each. The derived formulas reveal the efficiency implications of including a baseline outcome measurement, and provide a natural vehicle for the efficiency comparisons across adjustment approaches to generate practical recommendations. We validate the power and sample size methods under each baseline adjustment approach using simulations and provide an illustrative sample size calculation with a baseline outcome using the context of a real SW-CRT.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationHumansLinear ModelsSample SizeTreatment Outcomebaseline adjustmentcross‐sectional designintracluster correlation coefficientlinear mixed modelpower calculationrelative efficiency

Identifiers

PMID40988307
PMCPMC12919305

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.