Evidence mapPaperPMID 40988672Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Prevalence of ultra-processed foods and beverages in newly launched products across the Americas: a comparison between the United States and Latin American countries from 2018 to 2023.

Gabriela Vatavuk-Serrati, Katie A Meyer, Donna R Miles, Lindsey Smith Taillie

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriela Vatavuk-SerratiDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Katie A MeyerDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Donna R MilesCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Lindsey Smith TaillieDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are an increasing global health concern, but their prevalence across the food supply is unknown. This is particularly important in developing countries such as Latin America, where consumption is lower but increasing. We quantified country-specific metrics of UPFs in the food supply across the Americas, including the prevalence of UPFs, the presence and number of additives, and the extent to which UPFs and non-UPFs are high in saturated fat, sugar, and sodium (HFSS). Methods: Using data on packaged products launched between 2018 and 2023 from the Mintel Global New Products Database in 11 North and Latin American countries ( Results: The prevalence of UPFs ranged from 69 in Venezuela to 85% in Costa Rica. Flavors and other additives were the most prevalent, ranging from 60 to 78% and 49 to 70% in Venezuela and Costa Rica, respectively. The mean number of additives ranged from 3.9 in Venezuela to 7.1 in Peru. For foods, but not beverages, a higher percentage of ultra-processed products were HFSS compared to non-ultra-processed products. Conclusion: The prevalence of UPFs among newly launched products is high across all countries in the Americas. Policies are needed to create healthier food supplies in the region.

Indexed as

BeveragesFast FoodsFood HandlingFood SupplyFood, ProcessedHumansLatin AmericaPrevalenceUnited Statesadditivesdiet disparitiespackaged foods and beveragessaturated fatssodiumsugarstrendsultra-processed foods and beverages

Identifiers

PMID40988672
PMCPMC12450670

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.