ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Changes in quality of vitamin K antagonist treatment and clinical outcomes during Ramadan: a Dutch population-based cohort study.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ramadan fasting alters the timing and content of food, including dietary vitamin K, and medication intake, potentially affecting stability of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment and clinical outcomes. Objectives: To assess population-level changes in VKA treatment quality and incidence of clinical events, including bleeding and venous and arterial thromboembolism, during Ramadan in the Netherlands. Methods: Data from 17 Dutch anticoagulation clinics were linked to Statistics Netherlands. Prevalent VKA users in 2013-2019 with an immigration background who were likely to fast during Ramadan (ie, the Ramadan cohort) were studied from 2 months preceding Ramadan until 2 months after. During each 30-day interval, VKA treatment quality and risk of clinical events were assessed. A cohort of native Dutch VKA users was studied as negative control. Results: The Ramadan cohort included 3835 VKA users (median age 65.8 years, 55.2% male). Frequency of international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring, INR variability, and time within target range remained similar across Ramadan. However, the proportion of supratherapeutic INRs was slightly higher during (18.9% ± 31.5% [mean ± SD]) and after Ramadan (month +1, 19.9% ± 32.7% and month +2, 19.7% ± 32.8%) compared with before (month -2, 18.1 ± 30.9% and month -1, 17.8 ± 31.5%). Meanwhile, there was a higher proportion of clinically relevant dose reductions during Ramadan (4.7%) than the other months (3.6%-4.3%). These were not observed in the native Dutch cohort ( Conclusion: There were no clinically relevant population-level changes across Ramadan in VKA treatment quality and clinical outcomes, except for a slightly higher proportion of supratherapeutic INRs and dose reductions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.