ArticleIntegrative medicine research2026
Identification of auricular acupoints using a convolutional neural network.
Article in Integrative medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The accurate identification of acupoints is an essential task in acupuncture therapy. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to the exploration of automated landmark detection systems, which may provide more accurate and reliable acupoint detection. This study investigated the efficiency of an AI model in predicting the shenmen, lung, and mouth auricular acupoints and compared its performance to placements made by a practitioner of traditional Korean medicine. Methods: Ear images from 39 individuals were captured from three different angles. The mask region-based convolutional neural network (Mask R-CNN) model was utilized to isolate the ear region, followed by landmark detection using a CNN model trained on resized images to predict three auricular acupoints. Model reliability was enhanced by treating each acupoint as a separate prediction coordinate. Acupoint distribution was also estimated using a kernel density estimation method. Results: Centroids of auricular acupoints predicted by the CNN model showed deviations of < 3 pixels from traditional placements by the practitioner. Kernel density estimation showed that CNN predictions led to narrower acupoint distributions compared with those placed by the practitioner, suggesting higher consistency in CNN model predictions across different images. Conclusions: The AI-driven approach showed significant potential in improving both the accuracy and consistency of auricular acupoint identification. These findings support the integration of AI into acupuncture practice as a reliable tool for enhancing clinical accuracy and precision of acupoint location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.