ArticleHealth promotion perspectives2025
Identification of needs of integrated approaches of occupational health and safety and health promotion.
Article in Health promotion perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating Occupational Health and Safety and Health Promotion: A Qualitative Study in Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Occupational health and safety (OHS) interventions predominantly target workplace ergonomic, psychosocial, and material risks. Workplace health promotion (WHP) interventions have a primary focus on health education-related activities and health behaviour change. The aim of this study was to assess the workers' needs of OHS-WHP integrated approaches in Australia. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 2024 among 261 Australian workers across various industries (mainly including education, health, retail, recreation). Eligible participants were employed in Australian workplaces under any contract type and were aged≥18 years. Data were collected through an online survey via Qualtrics platform. This article focuses on the qualitative data generated from the main open-ended question of the survey. The data were analysed employing a thematic inductive approach. Results: Thematic analysis identified seven key areas for integrating OHS and WHP, mainly including the need for more frequent breaks (49%), enhanced training and education (33%), mental health support (19%), and risk management (19%). The remaining three areas less frequently reported included ergonomic workstations (e.g. adjustable chair) (15%), recreational and physical activities (e.g. stretching exercises) (15%), and Personal Protective Equipment (e.g. visibility clothes) (6%). Conclusion: Future integrated interventions should prioritise breaks, education, and mental health resources to improve workplace well-being. WHP educational activities could inform OHS information delivery process, possibly enhanced through recreational activities. The engagement of all stakeholders, mainly including employers and workers, when planning and implementing integrated approaches, requires attention and further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.