ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Enhancing human activity recognition with machine learning: insights from smartphone accelerometer and magnetometer data.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing human activity recognition with machine learning: insights from smartphone accelerometer and magnetometer data.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The domain of Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has undergone a remarkable evolution, driven by advancements in sensor technology, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning algorithms. The aim of this article consists of taking as a basis the previously obtained results to implement other techniques to analyze the same dataset and improve the results previously obtained in the different studies, such as neural networks with different configurations, random forest, support vector machine, CN2 rule inducer, Naive Bayes, and AdaBoost. The methodology consists of data collection from smartphone sensors, data cleaning and normalization, feature extraction techniques, and the implementation of various machine learning models. The study analyzed machine learning models for recognizing human activities using data from smartphone sensors. The results showed that the neural network and random forest models were highly effective across multiple metrics. The models achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 98.42%, a classification accuracy of 90.14%, an F1-score of 90.13%, a precision of 90.18%, and a recall of 90.14%. With significantly reduced computational cost, our approach outperforms earlier models using the same dataset and achieves results comparable to those of contemporary deep learning-based approaches. Unlike prior studies, our work utilizes non-normalized data and integrates magnetometer signals to enhance performance, all while employing lightweight models within a reproducible visual workflow. This approach is novel, efficient, and deployable on mobile devices in real-time. This approach makes it an ideal fit for real-time mobile applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.