Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989342›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Hybrid ARIMA-LSTM for COVID-19 forecasting: a comparative AI modeling study.

Al Mahmud, Syed Husni Noor Syed Hatim Noor, Kamarul Imran Musa, Firdaus Mohamad Hamzah, Zainab Mat Yudin, Noorshaida Kamaruddin, Ashwini M Madawana, Mohamad Arif Awang Nawi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. PVADet: fast patient-ventilator asynchrony detection on waveforms.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Al MahmudSchool of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Syed Husni Noor Syed Hatim NoorSchool of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Kamarul Imran MusaSchool of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-3708-0628
Firdaus Mohamad HamzahDepartment of Mathematics, Centre for Defence Foundation Studies, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, Sungai Besi, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Zainab Mat YudinSchool of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-4283-3548
Noorshaida KamaruddinSchool of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9076-9918
Ashwini M MadawanaSchool of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4738-3059
Mohamad Arif Awang NawiSchool of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pandemics present critical challenges to global health systems, economies, and societal structures, necessitating the development of accurate forecasting models for effective intervention and resource allocation. Classical statistical models such as the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) have been widely employed in epidemiological forecasting; however, they struggle to capture the nonlinear trends and dynamic fluctuations inherent in pandemic data. Conversely, deep learning models such as long short-term memory (LSTM) networks demonstrate strong capabilities in modeling complex dependencies but often require substantial data and computational resources. To boost forecasting precision, hybrid models such as ARIMA-LSTM integrate the advantages of traditional and deep learning methods. This study evaluates and compares the performance of ARIMA, LSTM, and hybrid ARIMA-LSTM models in predicting pandemic trends, using COVID-19 data from the Malaysian Ministry of Health as a case study. The dataset covers the period from 4 January 2021 to 18 September 2021, and model performance is evaluated using key metrics, including mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean squared error (RMSE), relative root mean squared error (RRMSE), normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R

Indexed as

COVID-19 predictionHybrid ARIMA-LSTM modelMachine learning in epidemiologyPandemic forecastingPredictive analytics for infectious diseasesTime-series analysis

Identifiers

PMID40989342
PMCPMC12453849

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.