ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Hybrid ARIMA-LSTM for COVID-19 forecasting: a comparative AI modeling study.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing COVID-19 Forecasting Accuracy in Malaysia Using a Hybrid ARIMA-LSTM Model With Exogenous Variables: A Time-Series Predictive Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling of medical waste and a proposal to improve segregation in a peruvian hospital.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- PVADet: fast patient-ventilator asynchrony detection on waveforms.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pandemics present critical challenges to global health systems, economies, and societal structures, necessitating the development of accurate forecasting models for effective intervention and resource allocation. Classical statistical models such as the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) have been widely employed in epidemiological forecasting; however, they struggle to capture the nonlinear trends and dynamic fluctuations inherent in pandemic data. Conversely, deep learning models such as long short-term memory (LSTM) networks demonstrate strong capabilities in modeling complex dependencies but often require substantial data and computational resources. To boost forecasting precision, hybrid models such as ARIMA-LSTM integrate the advantages of traditional and deep learning methods. This study evaluates and compares the performance of ARIMA, LSTM, and hybrid ARIMA-LSTM models in predicting pandemic trends, using COVID-19 data from the Malaysian Ministry of Health as a case study. The dataset covers the period from 4 January 2021 to 18 September 2021, and model performance is evaluated using key metrics, including mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean squared error (RMSE), relative root mean squared error (RRMSE), normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.