Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40989380›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Exploring mHealth interventions for medication management: a scoping review of digital tools, implementation barriers, and patient outcomes.

Xuye Wang, Beibei Wang, Wan Yin Tew, Xiaoning Yang, Xiangyang Xu, Yifang Gao, Yongjia Chen, Mun Fei Yam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xuye WangDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Beibei WangSchool of Pharmacy, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Wan Yin TewDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Xiaoning YangSchool of Pharmacy, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xiangyang XuDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Yifang GaoSchool of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Yongjia ChenSchool of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Mun Fei YamDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medication non-adherence remains a significant global healthcare challenge, resulting in inadequate disease management, increased hospitalisations, and higher healthcare costs. Mobile health (mHealth) applications have emerged as promising digital health tools for enhancing medication adherence through real-time monitoring, personalised reminders, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven interventions, and improved patient engagement. Objectives: This scoping review examines the effectiveness, key features, and challenges of mHealth applications in promoting medication adherence across diverse patient populations and healthcare settings. It also seeks to identify research gaps and inform future development and implementation strategies for digital therapeutics. Eligibility Criteria: Studies published between 2020 and 2024 were included if they investigated the use of mHealth applications to improve medication adherence and reported outcomes related to adherence rates, patient health indicators, or user engagement. Only studies with empirical data, including randomised controlled trials, observational studies, or mixed-methods research, were considered. Sources of Evidence: A comprehensive search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and CINAHL databases. In total, 319 studies met the inclusion criteria following a systematic screening process based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Charting Methods: Data were extracted on study design, app functionalities, patient demographics, adherence outcomes, and barriers to adoption. The charted data were thematically synthesised to identify trends, success factors, and limitations. Results: Among the included studies, 85% reported improved medication adherence associated with features such as personalised medication reminders, real-time health tracking, and AI-powered adherence prediction. Clinical outcomes were also frequently observed, including improved blood pressure, glucose control, and patient-reported quality of life. Key barriers to adoption included limited digital literacy, concerns about data privacy, socioeconomic disparities, and a lack of integration with electronic health records (EHRs). Conclusions: mHealth applications show significant potential to improve medication adherence and health outcomes, particularly in the management of chronic diseases. However, inclusive design, robust data privacy frameworks, and evidence-based implementation strategies are essential for scalability and sustained impact. Future research should focus on long-term effectiveness, cost-efficiency, and integration of mHealth tools within broader healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence in healthcareDigital therapeuticsHealth informaticsMedication adherenceMobile health applicationsPatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID40989380
PMCPMC12453750

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.