ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Exploring mHealth interventions for medication management: a scoping review of digital tools, implementation barriers, and patient outcomes.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanostructured electrode materials and flexible-substrate engineering for wearable multi-analyte biosensors in diabetes monitoring and personalized care: a comprehensive review.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- Use and Influencing Factors of mHealth Services Among Adult Survivors of Cancer: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Determinants of mobile health application utilization in Lebanon: a cross-sectional study of perceptions, barriers, and engagement.BMC public health · 2026Article
- eHealth literacy in older patients with cardiovascular disease: latent profile analysis and associated factors.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medication non-adherence remains a significant global healthcare challenge, resulting in inadequate disease management, increased hospitalisations, and higher healthcare costs. Mobile health (mHealth) applications have emerged as promising digital health tools for enhancing medication adherence through real-time monitoring, personalised reminders, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven interventions, and improved patient engagement. Objectives: This scoping review examines the effectiveness, key features, and challenges of mHealth applications in promoting medication adherence across diverse patient populations and healthcare settings. It also seeks to identify research gaps and inform future development and implementation strategies for digital therapeutics. Eligibility Criteria: Studies published between 2020 and 2024 were included if they investigated the use of mHealth applications to improve medication adherence and reported outcomes related to adherence rates, patient health indicators, or user engagement. Only studies with empirical data, including randomised controlled trials, observational studies, or mixed-methods research, were considered. Sources of Evidence: A comprehensive search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and CINAHL databases. In total, 319 studies met the inclusion criteria following a systematic screening process based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Charting Methods: Data were extracted on study design, app functionalities, patient demographics, adherence outcomes, and barriers to adoption. The charted data were thematically synthesised to identify trends, success factors, and limitations. Results: Among the included studies, 85% reported improved medication adherence associated with features such as personalised medication reminders, real-time health tracking, and AI-powered adherence prediction. Clinical outcomes were also frequently observed, including improved blood pressure, glucose control, and patient-reported quality of life. Key barriers to adoption included limited digital literacy, concerns about data privacy, socioeconomic disparities, and a lack of integration with electronic health records (EHRs). Conclusions: mHealth applications show significant potential to improve medication adherence and health outcomes, particularly in the management of chronic diseases. However, inclusive design, robust data privacy frameworks, and evidence-based implementation strategies are essential for scalability and sustained impact. Future research should focus on long-term effectiveness, cost-efficiency, and integration of mHealth tools within broader healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.