ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Next generation sequencing under attack: investigating insider threats and organizational behaviour.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next generation sequencing (NGS) has become a cornerstone of modern genomics, enabling high-throughput analysis of DNA and RNA with wide applications across medicine, research, and biotechnology. However, the growing adoption of NGS technologies has introduced significant cyber-biosecurity risks, particularly those arising from insider threats and organizational shortcomings. While technical vulnerabilities have received attention, the human and behavioral dimensions of cybersecurity in NGS environments remain underexplored. This study investigates the role of human factors and organizational behavior in shaping cyber-biosecurity risks in NGS workflows. A mixed-method approach was employed, combining survey data from 120 participants across four countries with statistical analyses including chi-square tests, cross-tabulations, and cluster analysis. The study assessed cybersecurity training availability, employee engagement, training effectiveness, and awareness of insider threats. Findings reveal substantial gaps in training frequency and participation, with 36% of respondents reporting no access to NGS-specific cybersecurity training. Only a minority of participants felt confident in detecting cyber threats, and 32.5% had never applied cybersecurity knowledge in practice. Chi-square results indicate significant associations between training frequency and threat recognition, training relevance, and knowledge application. Cluster analysis further categorized organizations into "robust," "moderate," and "emergent" cybersecurity maturity profiles. The study offers an evidence-based framework to enhance cyber-biosecurity in NGS settings by addressing human-centric risks. It recommends role-specific training, frequent policy updates, and improved organizational communication to mitigate insider threats. These insights support the development of targeted interventions and policies to strengthen the cybersecurity culture in genomics organizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.