ReviewRSC advances2025
Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) in forensic investigations: a review of current applications and future perspectives.
Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of Carbon Quantum Dots (CQDs) has introduced transformative possibilities in forensic science, addressing longstanding challenges in the detection, analysis, and preservation of trace evidence. This review comprehensively examines CQDs, highlighting their synthesis methodologies, unique physicochemical properties, and diverse applications in forensic investigations. Emphasizing green, scalable, and cost-effective synthesis routes, the review explores CQDs' tunable fluorescence, exceptional optical characteristics, and biocompatibility, which contribute to their superior performance in forensic contexts. Specifically, CQDs have shown significant promise in areas such as crime scene analysis, fingerprint enhancement, drug identification, and toxicology, offering enhanced sensitivity, specificity, and precision in evidence detection. Despite their potential, the integration of CQDs into forensic workflows faces hurdles related to reproducibility, standardization, and regulatory compliance. Moreover, the convergence of CQDs with cutting-edge technologies like artificial intelligence and computational simulations presents an exciting frontier for advancing forensic methodologies, minimizing human error, and ensuring high throughput and accuracy in investigative processes. This review not only underscores the potential of CQDs to revolutionize forensic science but also identifies key challenges and proposes future directions for research, focusing on refining CQD-based applications and fostering seamless integration into forensic protocols. In summary, CQDs represent a promising and versatile toolset for the future of forensic investigations, driving significant improvements in analytical precision and efficiency.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.