ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor with early liver metastasis misdiagnosed as vaginal wall tumor: a rare case report.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. They lack specific clinical manifestations and imaging characteristics, leading to a high risk of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. Here, we describe a 49-year-old female initially diagnosed with a vaginal wall tumor who underwent vaginal tumor resection surgery. The final diagnosis was a high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor (epithelioid type). Uniquely, one month after surgery, enhanced CT and PET/MR/CT scans indicated liver metastasis. The patient underwent a partial resection of the left liver and was subsequently treated with oral imatinib. Six months post-surgery, the patient has shown no signs of recurrence. This case accentuates the need for clinicians to improve their understanding of this disease to reduce the rates of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. Surgical resection is an effective treatment for localized rectal GISTs, but vigilance for distant metastasis is essential. Enhanced CT and PET/MR/CT scans are necessary. Female patients with GISTs located on the anterior rectal wall may be suitable for a vaginal approach surgery, however, the indications need further study. The importance of early differential diagnosis of rectal GISTs need to be highlighting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.