ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity: a case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a rare subtype of papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with unique morphology, molecular features, and good prognosis. Given its rarity, with less than 100 reported cases, further characterization is needed to enhance diagnostic accuracy and inform management strategies. Case presentation: We report the case of a 59-year-old African American female with an incidentally discovered 2.1 cm left renal mass on imaging. The patient has a medical history of hypertension, asthma, hyperlipidemia, vertigo, depression/anxiety, and prediabetes. Further evaluation via contrast-enhanced CT confirmed an enhancing renal mass without evidence of metastasis. She underwent a robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy, and postoperative pathology confirmed PRNRP with pT1aNxMxR0 staging and ISUP nuclear grade 1. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated positive staining for GATA3, CK7, and EMA, and Vimentin and negative for AMACR and CA IX. Molecular profiling revealed a KRAS mutation, a key feature of PRNRP. Postoperative recovery was uneventful aside from transient vertigo, and no further treatment was required. Conclusion: This case reinforces the distinct morphological and molecular profile of PRNRP, distinguishing it from other papillary RCC subtypes. The indolent behavior, absence of metastatic cases, and characteristic molecular profiling and immunohistochemical markers highlight the importance of accurate classification for optimal patient management. Furthermore, the PD-L1 positivity observed in this case raises potential implications for immune checkpoint therapy, an area warranting further investigation. As PRNRP is recently classified, continued study is essential to refine diagnostic, therapeutic, and surveillance strategies for this rare renal neoplasm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.