Firearm Injuries: Unveiling the Unmatched Healthcare Burden and Costs.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate hospital resource utilization in the treatment of firearm-related injuries compared to other penetrating and blunt traumas. Background: Trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, with firearm injuries becoming the leading cause of pediatric death as of 2020. Despite the known mortality, the burden of inpatient healthcare for initially nonfatal firearm injuries is poorly understood. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of the National Inpatient Sample was performed. The study population included patients with firearm injuries, penetrating traumas, and blunt traumas from 2017 to 2021. Primary interventions assessed included surgical procedures performed during hospitalization, and the outcomes evaluated were costs, length of stay, and mortality. Comparisons were made between the 3 injury groups (firearm, penetrating trauma, and blunt trauma) across these key variables. Results: Among 10,653,446 patients identified, 243,295 (2.3%) had a firearm injury, 287,110 (2.7%) had a penetrating injury, and 10,123,041 (95%) had blunt trauma. Patients sustaining firearm injuries required more resuscitative interventions and major surgical procedures, such as pericardiotomy, chest tube placement, exploratory thoracotomy, and laparotomy. The mean length of inpatient stay was longer for firearm injuries (7.8 days) compared with penetrating (5.7 days) and blunt trauma (6.0 days, Conclusions: Although firearm injuries account for only a proportion of total trauma cases, they are associated with higher inpatient resource utilization, as measured by interventions and hospital costs. These findings highlight the need for focused prevention efforts and resource allocation to address unique challenges posed by firearm injuries.