SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2025
Pharmacotherapy for mild hypertension.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleThis is an update of a Cochrane review published in 2012 of initiation of antihypertensive monotherapy or step-up therapy in people with untreated mild hypertension (systolic blood pressure 140 to 159 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure 90 to 99 mmHg, or both) and no pre-existing cardiovascular disease. The original review demonstrated no difference in the incidence of all-cause mortality, total cardiovascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure), stroke incidence, coronary heart disease, or withdrawal due to adverse effects (WDAEs). Evidence for antihypertensive pharmacotherapy in people with mild hypertension for primary prevention remains uncertain in the literature with conflicting studies. We therefore performed an update of the original Cochrane review to reassess whether initiation of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy compared to placebo or no treatment in people with untreated mild hypertension and no pre-existing cardiovascular disease reduces the risk of all-cause mortality, total cardiovascular events, stroke, coronary heart disease, or WDAEs.
objectivesTo reassess the efficacy and risks of initiating antihypertensive pharmacotherapy in adults with untreated mild hypertension and no pre-existing cardiovascular disease. The primary objective was to reassess the risk of all-cause mortality and total cardiovascular events (defined as fatal and non-fatal strokes, myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure). The secondary objectives were to reassess the risk of stroke (fatal and non-fatal), coronary heart disease (fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death), and WDAEs. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to June 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of at least one-year duration comparing initiation on antihypertensive monotherapy or step-up therapy, or both, versus placebo or no treatment in participants with mild hypertension and no pre-existing cardiovascular disease. OUTCOMES: Our critical outcomes were all-cause mortality and total cardiovascular events. Important outcomes were stroke, coronary heart disease (fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death), and WDAEs. RISK OF BIAS: Two review authors assessed risk of bias independently and in duplicate using Cochrane's RoB 1 tool. SYNTHESIS
methodsTwo review authors performed title and abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction independently and in duplicate. We calculated risk ratio (RR) along with 95% confidence interval (CI) for all-cause mortality, total cardiovascular events, stroke events, coronary heart disease events, and WDAEs with the Mantel-Haenszel test and a fixed-effect model. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included five trials involving a total of 9124 participants, of whom 4593 received antihypertensives and 4531 received placebo or no treatment. All five trials reported all-cause mortality; four trials reported total cardiovascular events and strokes; three trials reported coronary heart disease; and one trial reported WDAEs. SYNTHESIS OF
resultsThere may be little to no reduction in all-cause mortality (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.14; 5 trials, 9124 participants; low-certainty evidence), total cardiovascular events (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.24; 4 trials, 7292 participants; low-certainty evidence), or coronary heart disease (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.57; 3 trials, 7080 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be a decreased risk of stroke (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.84; 4 trials, 7292 participants; low-certainty evidence) and an increase in WDAEs (RR 4.80, 95% CI 4.14 to 5.57; 1 trial, 17,354 participants; low-certainty evidence) with antihypertensives. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for all outcomes due to imprecision, indirectness, and risk of bias. AUTHORS'
conclusionsIn people with untreated mild hypertension and no pre-existing cardiovascular disease, initiation of antihypertensive monotherapy or step-up therapy may not reduce all-cause mortality, total cardiovascular events, or coronary heart disease compared to those who received placebo or no treatment. There may be a reduction in stroke, but possibly also an increase in WDAEs.
fundingCIHR Grant to the Hypertension Review Group and British Columbia Ministry of Health Grant to the Therapeutics Initiative. REGISTRATION: Protocol (2007): doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006742. Original review (2012): doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006742.pub2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.