ReviewNucleic acids research2025
On the origin, evolution, and maintenance of RNA editing.
Review in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A single-cell transcriptome atlas reveals paradoxical monoallelic expression of RNA editing and heterozygous SNPs.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- A-to-I mRNA editing: Why not simply incorporate inosine during mRNA synthesis?Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Article
- RNA variation as the driver of genomic efficiency and phenotypic complexity.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
- Abundant A-to-I RNA editing in spermatocytes may suppress transposons to compensate for piRNA downregulation in male germlines.RNA biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A newly published review by Bendich and Rogers (The biological and evolutionary consequences of competition between DNA sequences that benefit the cell and DNA sequences that benefit themselves. Nucleic Acids Research2025;53:gkaf589.) discusses the origin of RNA editing as a defense against mobile genetic elements (MGEs) and points out that many recent reviews, including ours, failed to recognize this fundamental issue. In this article, we expand on this perspective by examining the mechanistic and theoretical gaps regarding whether RNA editing suppresses or tolerates TE proliferation. We highlight the relevance of constructive neutral evolution (CNE) theory, suggesting that regardless of whether the editing machinery has arisen via CNE, specific editing sites do exhibit CNE signals. Additionally, we explore why certain A-to-I recoding sites are selectively maintained without being replaced with genomic G, reinforcing their indispensable regulatory role. Taken together, while acknowledging the plausibility of the MGE-related origin, we advocate for a broader view of RNA editing that includes multiple fascinating functions like proteome diversification and mutation correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.