ReviewTherapeutic drug monitoring2026
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Point-of-Care Technologies: Opportunities and Current Challenges.
Review in Therapeutic drug monitoring, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Model-based meta-analysis of individual patient data for the characterization of intravenous 5-fluorouracil population pharmacokinetics.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Guiding point-of-care therapeutic drug monitoring through structure-toxicity principles.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Patient-derived resources for decoding and targeting brain metastases ecosystems.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Review
- The Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway in arthritis: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic potential.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis review re-evaluates therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) by comparing the current analytical and subsequent clinical interpretation capabilities of hospital or community medical laboratories with the emerging potential of point-of-care (POC) devices, which could become increasingly utilized in hospital wards, day-hospital units, and outpatient clinic settings.
methodsA narrative review was conducted to identify publications that best illustrate the current trends in the development of POC TDM.
resultsThe latest scientific and technical literature indicates that POC devices for determining drug concentrations in clinical samples are approaching the market. Several technologies are now available to develop portable sensors capable of rapidly returning concentration measurements. Interfacing these methods with artificial intelligence-based pattern recognition may enhance the identification and quantification of drugs. However, once the drug concentration is accurately measured using a portable device, dosage adjustments require consideration of the drug's pharmacokinetics and the patient's characteristics. This is accounted for in the mathematical approaches underlying model-informed precision dosing, which consider inter- and intra-individual variability and provide recommendations for treatment adjustments. These complexities necessitate the use of digital technologies, including graphical interfaces, machine learning approaches, and secure connectivity, to enhance the application of TDM in clinical practice.
conclusionsPromising emerging technologies have considerable potential to expand TDM to cover a wide range of drugs, making precision medicine accessible to many patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.