ReviewTherapeutic drug monitoring2025
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Oral Targeted Anticancer Drugs: Achievements, Experiences, Challenges, and the Path Forward.
Review in Therapeutic drug monitoring, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From empirical caution to precision resumption: model-informed management of a binimetinib overdose in a frail elderly patient.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Effect of dosing interval on the pharmacokinetic interaction between montmorillonite powder and pyrotinib in rats.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe introduction of oral targeted anticancer drugs has revolutionized anticancer treatments. Exposure to these drugs is often affected by individual, disease, or drug characteristics. As a result, these drugs often show high interpatient variability in drug exposure. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a useful tool for addressing the underlying problems of this variability: unnecessary toxicity and suboptimal efficacy. In this overview article, the authors discuss achievements, experiences, and current challenges of TDM for oral targeted anticancer drugs in clinical practice and highlight directions for future research.
methodsPubMed was searched for relevant clinical studies on TDM of oral targeted anticancer drugs.
resultsTDM for oral targeted anticancer drugs should be routinely conducted when exposure-response or exposure-toxicity relationships are established to avoid underexposure or overexposure, and on indication, to achieve reasonable drug exposure in individual cases when exposure is suspected to be outside the therapeutic index. The current challenges in supporting TDM for oral targeted anticancer drugs include the absence of compelling prospective evidence on clinical outcomes and the paucity of pharmacokinetic data for newly approved drugs. Future studies should address these issues.
conclusionsAdvancing TDM of oral targeted anticancer drugs requires finding the right drugs, the right patients, the right drug exposure targets, the right sampling methods, and the right evidence. Addressing these issues can facilitate clinical implementation and ensure that TDM can be applied for both older and newly approved oral targeted anticancer drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.