ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Prediction of neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer based on interpretable artificial intelligence.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable AI-Derived Spatial Pathological Features of Tumor, Necrosis, and Lymphocytes Identify Key Histological Signatures for Residual Cancer Burden Assessment in Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- An Exploratory Study on the Interrelation of Breast Cancer Molecular Phenotypes with Breast Cancer-Associated Adipose Tissues (BCAATs), Neoadjuvant, and Adjuvant Therapies: A Focus on Prognosis and Survival.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Synthetic Lethality-Informed Multi-Omic Framework for Identifying a Five-Gene Diagnostic Signature in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo develop an AI-based predictive model for neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) efficacy in breast cancer, we integrated multimodal data and analyzed tumor microenvironment (TME) features to provide interpretability.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed H&E-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) from a multicenter cohort of breast cancer patients receiving NAT to develop an AI predictive model. The cohort was stratified into training, test, internal validation, and external validation sets. Feature extraction used UNI and classification employed a multiple instance learning (MIL) framework. Model performance was evaluated via ROC curve analysis (AUC, precision, specificity, recall). Molecular mechanisms underlying model predictions were explored using TCGA multimodal data, integrating differential gene expression profiling with pathway enrichment analysis (GO, KEGG). TME component correlations with model scores were also investigated.
resultsThe AI model demonstrated robust discriminative capacity across three residual cancer burden (RCB)-based classification tasks in 826 patients from two centers, achieving peak performance in subtask 2 (NAT-sensitive: RCB 0-1 vs. NAT-resistant: RCB 2-3). For subtask 2, AUCs were 0.901 (training), 0.858 (test), 0.808 (internal validation), and 0.819 (external validation). Molecular analysis linked the model's predictive efficacy to tumor cell cycle processes. TME analysis revealed positive correlations between model scores and activated immune cells (M0/M1 macrophages, dendritic cells), and negative correlations with inhibitory cells (M2 macrophages, resting mast cells). Crucially, the model's predictive scores were closely related to tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), with spatial colocalization observed between classification weights and TILs distribution. Significant differences in TILs levels occurred across model score strata, validating the model's biological plausibility in predicting NAT response mechanisms.
conclusionWe developed an interpretable AI model that predicts response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer using H&E slides. The model's predictions are biologically interpretable, correlating with TME dynamics and spatial TIL patterns, offering a novel strategy for personalizing NAT treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.