ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
The different colorectal tumor risk related to GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors use: a network meta-analysis of 68 randomized controlled trials.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Gastric Neoplasm Risk with DPP-4 Inhibitors, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, and SGLT2 Inhibitors: Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Divergent Risks of Hematologic Malignancies Associated with GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors: Preliminary Findings from a Pilot Network Meta-Analysis.Biomolecules · 2025Pooled it
- Reassessing the risk-modifying effects of novel antidiabetic agents on asthma-COPD overlap syndrome: a dose-stratified network meta-analysis of 316,832 adults from 128 randomised trials.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and cancer risk: the good, the bad and the unknown.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Differential Acute Kidney Injury Profiles of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is: A Network Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Agent- and Dose-Specific Intestinal Obstruction Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Pharmacological mechanisms and clinical impacts of antidiabetic drugs on colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Colorectal Cancer Risk.AACE endocrinology and diabetesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent evidence has raised concerns about potential pro-oncogenic effects associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, particularly regarding gastrointestinal malignancies. Colorectal tumors, the third most diagnosed cancer globally, already show increased incidence in patients with metabolic disorders who typically require these medications. For example, obese subjects had a significantly higher risk of colorectal tumors than healthy subjects. However, existing evidence on this association remains inconsistent. This network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated the comparative incidence of colorectal tumors associated with specific GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a confirmatory NMA focused specifically on colorectal tumor incidence as an adverse effect, following Cochrane methodological recommendations. We performed a frequentist-based NMA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT2 inhibitors. Our primary outcome was colorectal tumor incidence, with safety profiles assessed by dropout rates as a secondary outcome.
resultsThis NMA encompassing 68 RCTs with 207 200 participants found that only semaglutide was associated with increased incidence of colorectal tumors compared to controls. A dose-stratified analysis revealed that high-dose injectable semaglutide (2.4 mg/week) was the only regimen associated with increased incidence. Furthermore, when focusing on RCTs of obese subjects, the increased colorectal tumor rate related to semaglutide still existed. Neither other GLP-1 receptor agonists nor any SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrated significant associations with colorectal tumor development.
conclusionOur study provides the first comprehensive NMA addressing the incidence of colorectal tumors related to individual GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors, suggesting a dose-dependent relationship to semaglutide, particularly in its high-dose injectable form (2.4 mg/week). These findings represent a potential risk signal that requires further validation, given the already elevated baseline colorectal tumor risk in the target population, especially in subjects with obesity. Future research should focus on long-term follow-up studies to better characterize the mechanisms and clinical implications of this semaglutide-specific risk signal. WHAT THIS ADDS TO THE EXISTING LITERATURE: This network meta-analysis, based on 68 randomized controlled trials, suggested that only semaglutide, especially in highdose injectable form (2.4 mg/week), was associated with increased incidence of colorectal tumors compared to controls, especially in obese patients. Neither other GLP-1 receptor agonists nor any SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrated significant associations with colorectal tumor development. LEARNING POINTS: Our study provides evidence regarding the increased incidence of colorectal tumors related to semaglutide in a dose dependent way (2.4 mg/week).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.