Evidence mapPaperPMID 40990658Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026

The different colorectal tumor risk related to GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors use: a network meta-analysis of 68 randomized controlled trials.

Chao-Ming Hung, Bing-Yan Zeng, Chih-Wei Hsu, Po-Huang Chen, Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Andre F Carvalho, Brendon Stubbs, Yen-Wen Chen, Tien-Yu Chen, Wei-Te Lei and 5 more

Abstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Chao-Ming HungDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-Da Cancer Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Bing-Yan ZengInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chih-Wei HsuDepartment of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Po-Huang ChenDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital; School of Medicine, National Defense Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cheuk-Kwan SunDepartment of Emergency Medicine, E-Da Dachang Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Andre F CarvalhoInnovation in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatment (IMPACT) Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Brendon StubbsDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Yen-Wen ChenProspect Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology & Neurology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Tien-Yu ChenSchool of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wei-Te LeiSection of Immunology, Rheumatology, and Allergy Department of Pediatrics, Hsinchu Munipical MacKay Children's Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Jiann-Jy ChenProspect Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology & Neurology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yow-Ling ShiueInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kuan-Pin SuMind-Body Interface Research Center (MBI-Lab), China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chih-Sung LiangDepartment of Psychiatry, Beitou Branch, Tri-Service General Hospital; School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ping-Tao TsengInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5761-7800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent evidence has raised concerns about potential pro-oncogenic effects associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, particularly regarding gastrointestinal malignancies. Colorectal tumors, the third most diagnosed cancer globally, already show increased incidence in patients with metabolic disorders who typically require these medications. For example, obese subjects had a significantly higher risk of colorectal tumors than healthy subjects. However, existing evidence on this association remains inconsistent. This network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated the comparative incidence of colorectal tumors associated with specific GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a confirmatory NMA focused specifically on colorectal tumor incidence as an adverse effect, following Cochrane methodological recommendations. We performed a frequentist-based NMA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT2 inhibitors. Our primary outcome was colorectal tumor incidence, with safety profiles assessed by dropout rates as a secondary outcome.

resultsThis NMA encompassing 68 RCTs with 207 200 participants found that only semaglutide was associated with increased incidence of colorectal tumors compared to controls. A dose-stratified analysis revealed that high-dose injectable semaglutide (2.4 mg/week) was the only regimen associated with increased incidence. Furthermore, when focusing on RCTs of obese subjects, the increased colorectal tumor rate related to semaglutide still existed. Neither other GLP-1 receptor agonists nor any SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrated significant associations with colorectal tumor development.

conclusionOur study provides the first comprehensive NMA addressing the incidence of colorectal tumors related to individual GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors, suggesting a dose-dependent relationship to semaglutide, particularly in its high-dose injectable form (2.4 mg/week). These findings represent a potential risk signal that requires further validation, given the already elevated baseline colorectal tumor risk in the target population, especially in subjects with obesity. Future research should focus on long-term follow-up studies to better characterize the mechanisms and clinical implications of this semaglutide-specific risk signal. WHAT THIS ADDS TO THE EXISTING LITERATURE: This network meta-analysis, based on 68 randomized controlled trials, suggested that only semaglutide, especially in highdose injectable form (2.4 mg/week), was associated with increased incidence of colorectal tumors compared to controls, especially in obese patients. Neither other GLP-1 receptor agonists nor any SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrated significant associations with colorectal tumor development. LEARNING POINTS: Our study provides evidence regarding the increased incidence of colorectal tumors related to semaglutide in a dose dependent way (2.4 mg/week).

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glucagon-Like PeptidesHumansIncidenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsGlucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitorscolorectal malignancycolorectal tumorGLP-1 receptor agonistnetwork meta-analysissemaglutideSGLT2 inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID40990658
PMCPMC12825905

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.