Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40990679›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026

Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting postoperative venous thromboembolism in esophageal cancer.

Zuhai Hu, Qianjie Xu, Yuliang Yuan, Xiaosheng Li, Haolin Zhang, Zhiqiang Wang, Haike Lei, Yongzhong Wu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zuhai HuChongqing Cancer Multi-omics Big Data Application Engineering Research Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Qianjie XuChongqing Cancer Multi-omics Big Data Application Engineering Research Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Yuliang YuanChongqing Cancer Multi-omics Big Data Application Engineering Research Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Xiaosheng LiChongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Haolin ZhangDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhiqiang WangChongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Haike LeiChongqing Cancer Multi-omics Big Data Application Engineering Research Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Yongzhong WuChongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk prediction model specifically for patients with esophageal cancer, using machine learning techniques to enhance clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.

methodsEight machine learning models-Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Neural Network (NN), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), AdaBoost, and Decision Tree-were constructed and rigorously evaluated. Model performance was assessed using the Brier score, calibration slope, F1 score, Youden index, the area under the curve (AUC), and accuracy (ACC). Decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curves were employed to evaluate clinical utility, while Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) plots were used to enhance model interpretability.

resultsThe study included 1595 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer, of whom 407 (25.52%) developed VTE during the study period. The models were ranked based on several metrics, with GBM achieving the highest overall score of 44. A Brier score of 0.151, a calibration slope of 1.031, an F1 score of 0.827, a Youden index of 0.466, an AUC of 0.797, and an ACC of 0.757 were obtained. Key predictors included D-dimer and Lymphocyte Count (LYM). SHAP analysis provided valuable insights into the relative contribution of each predictor to the model's risk assessment.

conclusionThis study established a robust VTE risk prediction model using GBM, demonstrating high accuracy and clinical applicability for patients with esophageal cancer. The integration of advanced machine learning techniques into clinical practice highlights the potential to reduce VTE-related morbidity and mortality in high-risk patient populations.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsMachine LearningPostoperative ComplicationsVenous ThromboembolismAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsesophageal carcinomamachine learningprediction modelVTE

Identifiers

PMID40990679
PMCPMC12825908

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.