Evidence mapPaperPMID 40990680Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026

Simultaneous assessment of stress hyperglycemia ratio and glucose variability to predict all-cause mortality in sepsis patients across different glucose metabolic states: an observational cohort study with interpretable machine learning approach.

Fuxu Wang, Yu Guo, Chucheng Jiao, Shuangmei Zhao, Liutao Sui, Zhi Mao, Ruogu Lu, Rongyao Hou, Xiaoyan Zhu

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fuxu WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yu GuoDepartment of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Chucheng JiaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Shuangmei ZhaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Liutao SuiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Zhi MaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ruogu LuMedical Innovation Research Department, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Rongyao HouDepartment of Neurology, The Affiliated Hiser Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xiaoyan ZhuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1078-4123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) and glycemic variability (GV) reflect acute glucose elevation and fluctuation, which are associated with adverse outcomes in patients with some diseases. However, the relationship between combined assessment of SHR and GV and mortality risk in sepsis remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the associations of SHR, GV, and their combination with sepsis mortality among individuals with different glucose metabolic states, and to develop a mortality prediction model using machine learning (ML) models.

methodsPatients with sepsis were screened in the MIMIC-IV database, stratified into normal glucose regulation (NGR), prediabetes mellitus (Pre-DM), and diabetes mellitus (DM) groups based on glucose metabolic status. Associations with mortality were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves, Cox proportional hazards model, restricted cubic splines (RCS), and landmark analyses. Five ML algorithms were employed for prediction, with SHapley Additive explanations (SHAP) interpreting key predictors.

resultsA total of 4838 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 68 years. Overall, 641 patients (13.2%) died in the ICU, and 936 patients (19.3%) died within 28 days after admission to the ICU. In NGR patients, combined high SHR (>1.23; highest tertile) and high GV (>28.56; highest tertile) - determined based on tertile distribution - conferred the highest 28-day mortality risk (HR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.40-3.04). Pre-DM patients with low SHR/high GV (SHR < 1.23, GV > 28.56) showed the greatest 28-day mortality risk (HR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.73-3.48). DM patients with high SHR/low GV (SHR > 1.23, GV < 28.56) had the highest 28-day mortality risk (HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.06-2.01). Machine learning models - particularly XGBoost (AUC: 0.746), Random Forest (AUC: 0.776), and Logistic Regression (AUC: 0.776) - demonstrated the strongest predictive performance for these endpoints.

conclusionThe combined assessment of SHR and GV may provide useful information for predicting mortality in sepsis patients - particularly among individuals with NGR and Pre-DM. This integrated approach highlights the potential need for personalized glycemic management strategies, which warrants further investigation in prospective studies.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseHyperglycemiaMachine LearningSepsisAgedCohort StudiesDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentBlood Glucoseglycemic variabilitymachine learningMIMIC-IV databasesepsisstress hyperglycemia ratio

Identifiers

PMID40990680
PMCPMC12825658

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.