Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40990707›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in infectious diseases2025

New drugs for the management of tuberculosis.

Gail B Cross

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. We Are Underprepared for Bedaquiline Resistance: A Call for Clinical and Programmatic Readiness.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gail B CrossBurnet Institute.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review summarizes recent and emerging advances in tuberculosis (TB) treatment, focusing on new therapeutics, repurposed agents, and shortened treatment regimens. It aims to contextualize key developments within the evolving TB treatment landscape and assess their potential to transform clinical management of both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant disease. RECENT

findingsEvidence from landmark trials, including Nix-TB, ZeNix, TB-PRACTECAL, STREAM, Study 31/A5349, SHINE, TRUNCATE-TB, endTB and BEAT-TB has supported the use of licensed, repurposed, and novel agents as new treatment strategies. These studies have demonstrated the feasibility of treatment-shortening regimens for drug-susceptible TB and improved outcomes for multidrug-resistant TB. Progress has expanded the therapeutic armamentarium, with promising regimens incorporating new agents, higher-dose rifamycins, and safer, all-oral combinations. SUMMARY: These advances have direct implications for clinical practice, offering shorter, safer, and more effective treatment options. Adoption of these new regimens into treatment guidelines will allow us to reduce treatment burden, improve adherence, and lower the risk of adverse effects. Continued optimization of drug combinations, dosing strategies, and safety profiles will be essential to achieving durable, scalable treatment options. Future research should prioritize regimen simplification, host-directed therapies, and tools for predicting and monitoring treatment response to support personalized, globally accessible TB care.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantDrug RepositioningDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansAntitubercular Agentsclinical trialsdiarylquinolonesDprE1 inhibitorsgabfeboroletuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID40990707
PMCPMC12582603

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.