ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025
Review of the effects of two major plastic compounds in arthropods: a call for increased interdisciplinarity and further studies at the population level.
Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the massive use of plastics worldwide, plastic chemicals such as bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and bisphenol A (BPA) are ubiquitous in the environment. Concerns about human health promoted studies on the effects of those two chemicals on vertebrates, where they have been found to act as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), thus affecting important biological functions under hormonal regulation (e.g. development and reproduction). While arthropods represent most of animal biodiversity and play crucial roles in aquatic and terrestrial environments, few studies have investigated DEHP and BPA effects on those organisms as compared to vertebrates. In this context, the present article aims at reviewing the known effects of DEHP and BPA on arthropods. DEHP and BPA affect various biological functions in arthropods, and could act at low doses and possibly induce long-term effects for organisms, but the mechanisms of actions of those chemicals in arthropods are still unknown. We discuss research gaps on this issue and ecotoxicology in arthropods in general: (1) the notion of DEHP and BPA as endocrine disruptors in arthropods; (2) the usefulness of behavioural studies in arthropods' ecotoxicology; (3) the need to better understand epigenetic mechanisms in arthropods and how chemicals could interfere with them; (4) the inclusion of the effects on arthropod's microbiota in ecotoxicological studies; and (5) the need to increase the use of integrative approaches, omics, modelling and adverse outcome pathways to better understand chemicals' mechanisms of actions in arthropods and the resulted adverse outcomes at population level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.