ArticleMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2025
Differential results of genetic risk scoring for multiple sclerosis in European and African American populations.
Article in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenetic risk scores (GRSs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) help identify high-risk individuals and stratify populations for clinical trials, but most are derived from European populations, raising questions about GRS accuracy in other ancestries.
objectivesWe aimed to determine whether an MS GRS can stratify individuals of African and Latino/admixed ancestry and assess whether the JointPRS tool enhances GRS portability in African ancestry.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study using All of Us (2018-2022), we derived a GRS from 232 variants for 32,428 European, 32,428 African, and 32,428 Latino/admixed participants, each divided into quintiles. The outcome was MS ascertained through International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/10 and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) codes. JointPRS was used to improve GRS portability in the African-ancestry group.
resultsMS prevalence was 1.0% in European, 0.56% in African, and 0.46% in Latino/admixed participants. The GRS stratified MS risk effectively in European (odds ratio (OR) = 2.30 (1.60-3.36); DISCUSSION: A GRS for MS stratified European and Latino/admixed individuals but not African ancestry. Incorporating African-specific data enhanced performance, underscoring the need for more ancestry-tailored GRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.