ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2026
Advances in haplotype phasing and genotype imputation.
Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- MixedUpParents: A New and Improved Method for Genetic Parentage Assignment in Admixed Populations.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Local Enrichment of Multi-SNP Markers Improves Genomic Prediction from Low-Density Genotyping in Pacific White Shrimp.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Targeted long-read RNA sequencing for rare disease diagnosis and variant interpretation.Science advances · 2026Article
- Fast Probabilistic Whitening Transformation for Ultra-High Dimensional Genetic Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Haplotype phasing - to determine which genetic variants reside on the same chromosome - and genotype imputation - to infer unobserved genotypes - have become indispensable steps to improve genome coverage for genomic analyses such as genome-wide association studies. Several tools exist for haplotype phasing and genotype imputation, all of which have continuously evolved to accommodate the increasing sample sizes of genomic studies and rapidly improving sequencing technologies. To fully leverage these recent advances, researchers must deliberate several practical considerations, including tool choice, quality control filters, data privacy concerns and reference panel choice. Looking ahead, long-read sequencing technologies are poised to bring novel opportunities to this field and drive methodological development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40993437What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.