Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40993635›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2025

Interventions to promote medical research integrity: a scoping review.

Sihui Liu, Yang Yang, Miqi Li

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sihui LiuDepartment of Scientific Research, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei Province, China. liusihui0812@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.
Yang YangDepartment of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Miqi LiDepartment of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.

Funding

Hubei Province health and family planning scientific research project WJ2023M019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study reviewed the current status of interventions for medical research integrity. The forms and methods of interventions, the timing and duration of interventions, outcome indicators, and evaluation methods and time were systematically reviewed. It provided a reference for the development of intervention programs for medical research integrity. So as to improve the integrity awareness and behavior norms of researchers.

methodsStudies related to medical research integrity and intervention measures were retrieved from databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Sinomed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wangfang Data, VIP Database). The time limit for retrieval extends from the establishment of the database to June 15,2024. Two researchers independently screened and analyzed the retrieved literature, and the third researcher was asked to decide if there was any doubt.

resultsThe study included 17 references from 10 countries. A systematic review of the literature found that the intervention of medical research integrity runs through all stages of school and work. There were various forms of intervention measures, including policy intervention, environmental intervention, educational intervention and software intervention. Educational intervention was the most commonly used intervention for medical research integrity. Most interventions were short-lived and lack long-term follow-up and standardized assessments.

conclusionsDifferent interventions have different characteristics and advantages in promoting the integrity of medical research. At present, there is still a lack of uniform standards and long-term evaluation mechanisms for medical research integrity. In the future, various levels and forms of intervention measures should be formulated to improve the integrity of medical research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchEthics, ResearchResearch PersonnelScientific MisconductHumansIntervention measuresMedical research integrityResearch integrityReview

Identifiers

PMID40993635
PMCPMC12462000

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.