ReviewJournal of translational medicine2025
Synbiotics in Alzheimer's disease: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and therapeutic prospects.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Butyrate Is Associated with the Antidepressant Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Traditional Chinese Medicine and Ferroptosis in Alzheimer's Disease: A Potential Therapeutic Approach.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Molecular mechanisms of gut microbiota dysbiosis and metabolites in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis: implications for precision therapeutics.Molecular brain · 2025Review
- The Endocannabinoid-Microbiota-Neuroimmune Super-System: A Unifying Feedback Architecture for Systems Resilience, Collapse Trajectories, and Precision Feedback Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGrowing evidence implicates gut microbiota (GM) dysbiosis in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis via the gut-brain axis. Dysbiosis contributes to neuroinflammation, amyloid-β deposition, tau hyperphosphorylation, blood-brain barrier disruption, and cognitive decline. Synbiotics (combinations of probiotics and prebiotics) offer a promising strategy to modulate GM, potentially ameliorating these AD hallmarks through multiple mechanisms including enhanced production of neuroprotective short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), reduced inflammation, improved gut barrier integrity, and immunomodulation.
objectiveThis review critically evaluates the current evidence on the therapeutic potential of synbiotics for AD. It aims to synthesize findings from preclinical and clinical studies regarding the efficacy of synbiotics in improving cognitive function and AD pathology, elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms including GM modulation, SCFA production, immune regulation, and gut-brain signaling, and identify key challenges and future research directions for translating GM-targeted interventions into effective AD therapies.
conclusionSynbiotics demonstrate significant potential, particularly in early AD, by improving cognitive domains, reducing neuroinflammation and AD biomarkers, and modulating beneficial microbial metabolites. However, challenges include confounding factors, unresolved questions about causality, inconsistent results in advanced disease, and insufficient large-scale human trials. Future success hinges on rigorous longitudinal randomized controlled trials integrating multi-omics approaches, advanced in vitro models, and personalized strategies considering baseline microbiota and host genetics. While not a standalone cure, synbiotics represent a valuable component within multi-target therapeutic approaches aimed at modulating the gut-brain axis to slow AD progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.