ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Physician self-reported factors driving clinical decision-making in management of patients with T2D and ASCVD/high risk of ASCVD across the middle East and Africa: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05317845 (A Multi-center, Cross-sectional Chart Review and Survey to Capture the Prevalence and Clinical Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Across Countries in the Middle East and Africa), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-center, Cross-sectional Chart Review and Survey to Capture the Prevalence and Clinical Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Across Countries in the Middle East and Africa
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To explore factors influencing the clinical decision-making of physicians treating patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) across seven Middle Eastern and African countries. Methods: Cross-sectional, anonymous online study of self-reported factors driving clinical decision-making for the management of T2D based on agreement with statements using a five-point Likert scale among physicians (n = 385) in Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, South Africa, and UAE between June 13 and October 1, 2022. Results: From a selection of patient factors, physicians were most likely to agree that treatment adherence/compliance (92%), safety concerns (92%), and impact on health-related quality of life (88%) influenced their decision-making. Most physicians agreed that availability of treatment (87%) was a practice setting factor that influenced their decision-making. The top three physician factors influencing clinical decision-making included continuous medical education (96%), medical knowledge (96%), and international clinical guidelines (95%). Most physicians agreed that improved communication skills of physicians (97%), coaching and question prompts for patients (91%), and patient decision aids (87%) could improve shared decision-making. Conclusion: Various patient, practice, and physician factors influenced physicians' management of their patients with T2D. Physicians believed improving their communication skills could improve shared decision-making. Clinical Trial Registration: The trial is registered with clinicaltrails.gov, Identifier #NCT05317845 (2023-03-28).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.