ArticleClinical practice in pediatric psychology2025
Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Case Series.
Article in Clinical practice in pediatric psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have risk for elevated negative affect, and mindfulness-based interventions (MBI) may be effective interventions. The aim of this case series was to (1) highlight individual changes in negative affect (depression, anxiety, and stress), mindfulness, and diabetes outcomes (diabetes distress, diabetes self-management, and HbA1c) after participating in an MBI and (2) highlight the utility of MBI in historically marginalized populations. Methods: Cases were chosen from a sample of adolescents with T1D and elevated negative affect who took part in a pilot randomized controlled trial of an MBI. Individuals were selected due to adherence to study protocol, similar baseline scores on target outcomes, and demographic similarities that indicate historical marginalization. The participants were two 12-14-year-old girls with T1D, one identifying as Black/African American, "Jayla," and one identifying as biracial Latinx/Hispanic, "Valerie" who participated in a 6-7 session virtual group MBI. Participants completed surveys at baseline, post-intervention, and three months post-intervention. Results: Jayla and Valerie demonstrated improvements in multiple domains including depression, anxiety, stress, mindfulness, diabetes distress, and diabetes self-management. We observed small improvements in HbA1c and disordered eating in Valerie, but not in Jayla. Conclusions: This case series demonstrates the potential utility of MBI in adolescents with T1D and negative affect, particularly those experiencing increased burden of SDOH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.