ArticleFrontiers in radiology2025
Intervertebral disc anomaly intelligent classification system based on deep learning, IDAICS.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress of diffusion tensor imaging in lumbar degenerative diseases: a narrative review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
- Enhanced YOLOv8-seg-SPDConv for accurate Schatzker classification of tibial plateau fractures.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Improved YOLOv8 with average pooling downsampling for detection and classification of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in X-ray images: a study focusing on AO/OTA classification.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intervertebral disc anomalies, such as degeneration and herniation, are common causes of spinal disorders, often leading to chronic pain and disability. Accurate diagnosis and classification of these anomalies are critical for determining appropriate treatment strategies. Traditional methods, such as manual image analysis, are prone to subjectivity and time-consuming. With the advancements in deep learning, automated and precise classification of intervertebral disc anomalies has become a promising alternative. Objective: This study aims to propose a deep learning-based method for classifying intervertebral disc abnormalities, with the goal of improving diagnostic accuracy and clinical efficiency in spinal health management. Methods: From August 2021 to March 2024, a dataset consisting of 574 CT images of intervertebral discs was collected and labeled into four clinically relevant categories: normal intervertebral discs, Schmorl's nodes, disc bulges, and disc protrusions. The dataset was divided into 500 images for model training, and 74 images for validation. A YOLOv8-seg network was employed for classification, with multiple preprocessing techniques applied to ensure data consistency and enhance model performance. Results: The IDAICS demonstrated high accuracy in classifying various intervertebral disc anomalies, including disc degeneration, herniation, and bulging, with a classification accuracy of over 93.2%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.905 ( Conclusion: This deep learning-based classification approach provides an efficient and reliable alternative to manual assessment, enabling automated diagnosis of intervertebral disc abnormalities. It offers significant potential to enhance clinical decision-making and improve spinal health management outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.