SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
Cognitive rehabilitation using virtual reality in subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Immersive Technologies for Cognitive Rehabilitation in Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Feasibility, Usability and Acceptance of a Multi-Component Cognitive Intervention Using Immersive Virtual Reality and Telemedicine in Individuals with Subjective Cognitive Decline.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Navigating Aging with Technology: A Scoping Review of Digital Interventions Addressing Intrinsic Capacity Decline in Older Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Are gamifying exergames the future of intervention for people with dementia? Systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- User Experience, System Usability, and Feasibility of Two Novel Immersive Virtual Reality Memory Tasks for Cognitive Training: A Pilot Study.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) are heterogeneous conditions that may indicate early dementia. Virtual Reality (VR) is emerging as a promising non-pharmacological tool for cognitive training. However, its effectiveness in these populations remains unclear. This systematic review examines the impact of VR-based cognitive interventions in individuals with SCD and MCI. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 2019 and 2025 investigating VR-based cognitive interventions in individuals diagnosed with SCD or MCI were identified through searches in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), experimental studies, and usability studies. Results: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including 14 RCTs, 2 usability studies, and 3 experimental studies. The majority of studies reported significant improvements in various cognitive domains, particularly memory, attention, and executive function, following VR-based interventions. Several studies also highlighted the positive impact of VR on user engagement and motivation, with high adherence and low dropout rates. However, there was considerable variability in intervention protocols, cognitive outcome measures, and participant characteristics. Most studies focused on individuals with MCI, while research on SCD populations remains limited and preliminary. Methodological quality varied, with some studies lacking adequate sample sizes or long-term follow-up. Conclusion: VR-based cognitive interventions appear to be a feasible and potentially effective approach for enhancing cognitive function in individuals with MCI, with emerging evidence also supporting their use in SCD. Despite encouraging results, further high-quality, large-scale trials are needed to validate these findings, standardize intervention protocols, and explore long-term benefits. Systematic review registration: CRD42025644894.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.