Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40994868›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

Cognitive rehabilitation using virtual reality in subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review.

Maria Grazia Maggio, Raffaela Maione, Maria Cotelli, Piero Bonasera, Francesco Corallo, Giulia Pistorino, Antonina Luca, Angela Marra, Angelo Quartarone, Alessandra Nicoletti and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria Grazia MaggioIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Raffaela MaioneIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Maria CotelliNeuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Piero BonaseraIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Francesco CoralloIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Giulia PistorinoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Messina, Messina, Italy.
Antonina LucaDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Techniques, Università degli Studi di Enna "Kore", Enna, Italy.
Angela MarraIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Angelo QuartaroneIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Alessandra NicolettiDepartment of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Rocco Salvatore CalabròIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) are heterogeneous conditions that may indicate early dementia. Virtual Reality (VR) is emerging as a promising non-pharmacological tool for cognitive training. However, its effectiveness in these populations remains unclear. This systematic review examines the impact of VR-based cognitive interventions in individuals with SCD and MCI. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 2019 and 2025 investigating VR-based cognitive interventions in individuals diagnosed with SCD or MCI were identified through searches in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), experimental studies, and usability studies. Results: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including 14 RCTs, 2 usability studies, and 3 experimental studies. The majority of studies reported significant improvements in various cognitive domains, particularly memory, attention, and executive function, following VR-based interventions. Several studies also highlighted the positive impact of VR on user engagement and motivation, with high adherence and low dropout rates. However, there was considerable variability in intervention protocols, cognitive outcome measures, and participant characteristics. Most studies focused on individuals with MCI, while research on SCD populations remains limited and preliminary. Methodological quality varied, with some studies lacking adequate sample sizes or long-term follow-up. Conclusion: VR-based cognitive interventions appear to be a feasible and potentially effective approach for enhancing cognitive function in individuals with MCI, with emerging evidence also supporting their use in SCD. Despite encouraging results, further high-quality, large-scale trials are needed to validate these findings, standardize intervention protocols, and explore long-term benefits. Systematic review registration: CRD42025644894.

Indexed as

cognitive rehabilitationearly diagnosismild cognitive impairmentneurorehabilitationsubjective cognitive declinevirtual reality-based cognitive training

Identifiers

PMID40994868
PMCPMC12454054

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.