Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40994887›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025

Challenges in evaluating thromboembolic risk in acute leukemia: clinical profiling and limitations of current scoring systems.

Luisa V Carvalho, José Vanildo R de Oliveira, Raphael B Melo, Fernanda R Mendes, Cynthia Rothschild, Elvira D R P Velloso, Vanderson Rocha, Eduardo M Rego, Fernanda A Orsi, Wellington F Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luisa V CarvalhoDivision of Hematology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
José Vanildo R de OliveiraDivision of Hematology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Raphael B MeloDivision of Hematology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda R MendesDivision of Hematology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cynthia RothschildDivision of Hematology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Elvira D R P VellosoDivision of Hematology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vanderson RochaDivision of Hematology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo M RegoDivision of Hematology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda A OrsiDivision of Hematology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wellington F SilvaDivision of Hematology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Limited evidence is available on risk factors for thrombotic events in newly diagnosed acute leukemia (AL) patients, and predictive tools in this population need further validation. Objectives: To evaluate the incidence of thrombosis in newly diagnosed AL patients and to validate known predictive scores. Methods: We retrospectively included 421 patients between 2009 and 2022. Data on thrombotic events (venous and arterial) were collected from admission to 60 days of follow-up. The Khorana, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) disseminated intravascular coagulation, and Siriraj Acute Myeloid/Lymphoblastic Leukemia scores were applied to the cohort. Results: The cumulative incidence of thrombotic events within 60 days was 15.8%, being higher in the acute lymphoblastic leukemia subgroup (21%). Seventy-two percent of the events occurred within the first 30 days of diagnosis. Superficial vein thrombosis and catheter-related thrombosis comprised most events (38.2% and 19.1%, respectively), while arterial thrombosis represented 11.8%. Obesity and platelet count > 20 × 10 Conclusion: The incidence of thrombotic events is not negligible, being higher in the induction phase. Further studies and better tools to improve event prediction in this population, such as biomarker development, are needed.

Indexed as

acute leukemiaarterial thrombosisclinical decision rulesdisseminated intravascular coagulationvenous thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID40994887
PMCPMC12455106

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.