ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Challenges in evaluating thromboembolic risk in acute leukemia: clinical profiling and limitations of current scoring systems.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Limited evidence is available on risk factors for thrombotic events in newly diagnosed acute leukemia (AL) patients, and predictive tools in this population need further validation. Objectives: To evaluate the incidence of thrombosis in newly diagnosed AL patients and to validate known predictive scores. Methods: We retrospectively included 421 patients between 2009 and 2022. Data on thrombotic events (venous and arterial) were collected from admission to 60 days of follow-up. The Khorana, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) disseminated intravascular coagulation, and Siriraj Acute Myeloid/Lymphoblastic Leukemia scores were applied to the cohort. Results: The cumulative incidence of thrombotic events within 60 days was 15.8%, being higher in the acute lymphoblastic leukemia subgroup (21%). Seventy-two percent of the events occurred within the first 30 days of diagnosis. Superficial vein thrombosis and catheter-related thrombosis comprised most events (38.2% and 19.1%, respectively), while arterial thrombosis represented 11.8%. Obesity and platelet count > 20 × 10 Conclusion: The incidence of thrombotic events is not negligible, being higher in the induction phase. Further studies and better tools to improve event prediction in this population, such as biomarker development, are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.